Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fs: make process.binding('fs') internal #22478

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

shisama
Copy link
Contributor

@shisama shisama commented Aug 23, 2018

Refs: #22160

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • tests and/or benchmarks are included
  • commit message follows commit guidelines

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added the lib / src Issues and PRs related to general changes in the lib or src directory. label Aug 23, 2018
@jasnell jasnell added the semver-major PRs that contain breaking changes and should be released in the next major version. label Aug 23, 2018
@addaleax
Copy link
Member

I’d prefer not to rush this one, given the history we have with fs bindings… Can we maybe land it early after the Node 11 semver-major cut?

@addaleax
Copy link
Member

@jasnell
Copy link
Member

jasnell commented Aug 23, 2018

This one also needs to be added to the fall-through whitelist in internal/bootstrap/node.js

@jdalton
Copy link
Member

jdalton commented Aug 23, 2018

@shisama For reference of the allow list changes you can check out this other pr.

@shisama shisama force-pushed the internal-binding-fs branch 3 times, most recently from 121225f to 69f7b28 Compare August 25, 2018 02:52
@shisama
Copy link
Contributor Author

shisama commented Aug 25, 2018

Thank you for your reviews. I fixed them.

@shisama shisama force-pushed the internal-binding-fs branch 2 times, most recently from 3dd21e1 to e367e77 Compare August 31, 2018 10:01
Copy link
Member

@BridgeAR BridgeAR left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM for version 12.

@BridgeAR BridgeAR added the blocked PRs that are blocked by other issues or PRs. label Aug 31, 2018
jasnell
jasnell previously approved these changes Sep 4, 2018
@jdalton
Copy link
Member

jdalton commented Sep 4, 2018

Why the semver-major on this if it's just changing how internally the fs binding is referenced? Externally process.binding('fs') still works the same, right?

@jasnell
Copy link
Member

jasnell commented Sep 4, 2018

That's just being very defensive and careful. process.binding() can be... touchy.

@targos
Copy link
Member

targos commented Sep 4, 2018

Semver-major makes sense but do we really need to prevent this from being in Node 11? I mean, we do not expect this to break anything and if citgm is fine with it and npm or graceful-fs are not broken, I think it's fine.

@jasnell
Copy link
Member

jasnell commented Sep 4, 2018

If citgm (and npm in particular) will continue to work, then I'm +1 on landing this in 11.

@jasnell
Copy link
Member

jasnell commented Sep 4, 2018

I don't believe this should be labeled blocked. If there's a disagreement on whether it should land for 11, then let's flag it for tsc-review or tsc-agenda.

@jasnell jasnell dismissed their stale review September 4, 2018 18:22

This is failing in CI

Copy link
Member

@jasnell jasnell left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There are relevant CITGM failures that need to be investigated.

@BridgeAR
Copy link
Member

BridgeAR commented Sep 5, 2018

CI https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/17032/ (The failure looked like it should also show up in our tests).

@shisama
Copy link
Contributor Author

shisama commented Oct 18, 2018

@jasnell @BridgeAR Thank you for your review and running CI. I rebased this, please run CI again. Thanks.

@joyeecheung
Copy link
Member

@shisama Can you squash the commit before landing them? See https://github.com/nodejs/node/blob/7e1b178fb637abc68b1d4da1363a19db7ad02d6c/doc/guides/contributing/pull-requests.md#commit-squashing

@shisama
Copy link
Contributor Author

shisama commented Nov 12, 2018

@joyeecheung Thank you. I squashed them.

@shisama
Copy link
Contributor Author

shisama commented Nov 13, 2018

@shisama
Copy link
Contributor Author

shisama commented Nov 13, 2018

@shisama
Copy link
Contributor Author

shisama commented Nov 13, 2018

@BridgeAR Hi, is the label blocked still needed?

@BridgeAR
Copy link
Member

I don't think so.

@BridgeAR BridgeAR removed the blocked PRs that are blocked by other issues or PRs. label Nov 13, 2018
@shisama
Copy link
Contributor Author

shisama commented Nov 16, 2018

Resume Build for node-test-commit-arm-fanned: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/18670/

shisama pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 16, 2018
Refs: #22160

PR-URL: #22478
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Denys Otrishko <[email protected]>
@shisama
Copy link
Contributor Author

shisama commented Nov 16, 2018

Landed in 1e23e3c

@shisama shisama closed this Nov 16, 2018
joyeecheung pushed a commit to joyeecheung/node that referenced this pull request Jan 11, 2019
Refs: nodejs#22160

PR-URL: nodejs#22478
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Denys Otrishko <[email protected]>
addaleax pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 14, 2019
Refs: #22160

PR-URL: #22478
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Denys Otrishko <[email protected]>

Backport-PR-URL: #25446
@BridgeAR BridgeAR mentioned this pull request Jan 16, 2019
BridgeAR pushed a commit to BridgeAR/node that referenced this pull request Jan 16, 2019
Refs: nodejs#22160

PR-URL: nodejs#22478
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Denys Otrishko <[email protected]>

Backport-PR-URL: nodejs#25446
BridgeAR added a commit to BridgeAR/node that referenced this pull request Jan 17, 2019
Notable Changes

* compression / zlib:
  * Added brotli support (Anna Henningsen and Zach Vacura)
    nodejs#24938
* console:
  * Added `inspectOptions` option (Ruben Bridgewater)
    nodejs#24978
* crypto:
  * Always accept private keys as public keys (Tobias Nießen)
    nodejs#25217
* deps:
  * Upgrade npm to v6.5.0 (Jordan Harband)
    nodejs#25234
* fs:
  * Use internalBinding('fs') internally instead of
    process.binding('fs') (Masashi Hirano)
    nodejs#22478
* http(s):
  * Support overriding http\\s.globalAgent (Roy Sommer)
    nodejs#25170
* util:
  * Inspect ArrayBuffers contents closely (Ruben Bridgewater)
    nodejs#25006
* worker:
  * Expose workers by default and remove `--experimental-worker` flag
    (Anna Henningsen) nodejs#25361

PR-URL: nodejs#25537
BridgeAR added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 18, 2019
Notable Changes

* compression / zlib:
  * Added brotli support (Anna Henningsen and Zach Vacura)
    #24938
* console:
  * Added `inspectOptions` option (Ruben Bridgewater)
    #24978
* crypto:
  * Always accept private keys as public keys (Tobias Nießen)
    #25217
* deps:
  * Upgrade npm to v6.5.0 (Jordan Harband)
    #25234
* fs:
  * Use internalBinding('fs') internally instead of
    process.binding('fs') (Masashi Hirano)
    #22478
* http(s):
  * Support overriding http\\s.globalAgent (Roy Sommer)
    #25170
* util:
  * Inspect ArrayBuffers contents closely (Ruben Bridgewater)
    #25006
* worker:
  * Expose workers by default and remove `--experimental-worker` flag
    (Anna Henningsen) #25361

PR-URL: #25537
@MylesBorins MylesBorins mentioned this pull request Jan 24, 2019
@joyeecheung joyeecheung removed the semver-major PRs that contain breaking changes and should be released in the next major version. label Jan 24, 2019
@joyeecheung
Copy link
Member

I am removing semver-major since this should not result in observable changes while fs is in the internal binding whitelist.

@BethGriggs
Copy link
Member

I've added the dont-land-on-v10.x label - but please let me know if you feel this should land on v10.x

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lib / src Issues and PRs related to general changes in the lib or src directory.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants