Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add tests to improve internal/crypto/pbkdf2.js coverage #17730

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from
Closed

Add tests to improve internal/crypto/pbkdf2.js coverage #17730

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

Leko
Copy link
Contributor

@Leko Leko commented Dec 18, 2017 •
edited
Loading

I added these tests

  • Add a test of _pbkdf2 where keylen is not a number
  • Add a test of _pbkdf2 where iterations < 0

Current coverage is here: https://coverage.nodejs.org/coverage-1fa59b4c7e575ca7/root/internal/crypto/diffiehellman.js.html

I cannot write a test where PBKDF2 returns -1.
I think it is coverage blockers so I create an issue (#17731).

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • tests and/or benchmarks are included
  • commit message follows commit guidelines
Affected core subsystem(s)

test

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added the test Issues and PRs related to the tests. label Dec 18, 2017
@Leko Leko mentioned this pull request Dec 18, 2017
Closed
@Leko Leko changed the title Add test cases to improve internal/crypto/pbkdf2.js Add tests to improve internal/crypto/pbkdf2.js Dec 18, 2017
@Leko Leko changed the title Add tests to improve internal/crypto/pbkdf2.js Add tests to improve internal/crypto/pbkdf2.js coverage Dec 18, 2017
cjihrig
cjihrig approved these changes Dec 18, 2017
View reviewed changes
test/parallel/test-crypto-pbkdf2.js Outdated
}
);

['str', null, undefined, [], {}].forEach((i) => {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Small nit: please use a more descriptive variable name than i.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for your review.
I renamed i to notNumber.

@maclover7
Copy link
Contributor

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/12240/

@tniessen
Copy link
Member

Landed in d50e1a2, thank you!

@tniessen tniessen closed this Dec 21, 2017
tniessen pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 21, 2017
@Leko @tniessen
test: increase pbkdf2 test coverage
d50e1a2 
PR-URL: #17730
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Jon Moss <[email protected]>
@Leko Leko deleted the add_test_crypto_pbkdf2 branch December 21, 2017 13:28
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 8, 2018
@Leko @MylesBorins
test: increase pbkdf2 test coverage
03ae4c2 
PR-URL: #17730
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Jon Moss <[email protected]>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 9, 2018
@Leko @MylesBorins
test: increase pbkdf2 test coverage
6d15185 
PR-URL: #17730
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Jon Moss <[email protected]>
@MylesBorins MylesBorins mentioned this pull request Jan 10, 2018
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@tniessen tniessen tniessen approved these changes

@maclover7 maclover7 maclover7 approved these changes

@cjihrig cjihrig cjihrig approved these changes

@lpinca lpinca lpinca approved these changes

@jasnell jasnell jasnell approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
test Issues and PRs related to the tests.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
8 participants
@Leko @maclover7 @tniessen @jasnell @lpinca @cjihrig @MylesBorins @nodejs-github-bot