-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
test,lib: remove scatalogical terminology #16599
Closed
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
jasnell
approved these changes
Oct 30, 2017
gireeshpunathil
approved these changes
Oct 30, 2017
I think the commit message should be 'net,test: ...' ? |
lpinca
approved these changes
Oct 30, 2017
gibfahn
approved these changes
Oct 30, 2017
cjihrig
approved these changes
Oct 30, 2017
Also I think it's scatological not scatalogical in the commit message FWIW. |
digitalinfinity
approved these changes
Oct 30, 2017
addaleax
approved these changes
Oct 30, 2017
apapirovski
approved these changes
Oct 30, 2017
Rebased, amended commit messages per the two nits about it, force pushed. |
jasnell
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 2, 2017
PR-URL: #16599 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anatoli Papirovski <[email protected]>
Landed in 2244f7d |
cjihrig
pushed a commit
to cjihrig/node
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 6, 2017
PR-URL: nodejs#16599 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anatoli Papirovski <[email protected]>
Merged
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 14, 2017
PR-URL: #16599 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anatoli Papirovski <[email protected]>
gibfahn
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 14, 2017
PR-URL: #16599 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anatoli Papirovski <[email protected]>
Merged
Merged
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There have been previous efforts to remove profanity from the code base. I'm not sure if the two here were missed, slipped in afterwards, were considered mild enough to be ignored, or if it's just something that is no longer a concern.
Which is a longwinded way of me saying that it's fine with me if this one gets closed without merging.
That said, this change does make the code base mildly more professional, albeit in a superficial way.
/cc @jasnell
Checklist
make -j4 test
(UNIX), orvcbuild test
(Windows) passesAffected core subsystem(s)
test lib