Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

url: handle windows drive letter in the file state #12808

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

watilde
Copy link
Member

@watilde watilde commented May 3, 2017

In the whatwg-url, C| should not satisfy the condition to not copy the base's path. This patch also synchronises WPT url test data to verify the update in upstream.

Refs: whatwg/url#305
Refs: web-platform-tests/wpt#5754

Checklist
Affected core subsystem(s)

url

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added c++ Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++. dont-land-on-v4.x whatwg-url Issues and PRs related to the WHATWG URL implementation. labels May 3, 2017
@watilde
Copy link
Member Author

watilde commented May 3, 2017

@rmisev
Copy link
Contributor

rmisev commented May 3, 2017

Oops! It looks like you copied other tests ... which was already in your tests file. Correct ones are commented # Windows drive letter handling with the 'file:' base URL in the https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/blob/f0b286344dd2613d48643394408f4ab48ef2b33d/url/urltestdata.json#L5426-L5524

@watilde
Copy link
Member Author

watilde commented May 3, 2017

Opps sorry! I re-copied them and got an error in make-test for this part(the other cases worked fine):

  {
    "input": "C|",
    "base": "file://host/dir/file",
    "href": "file:///C:",
    "protocol": "file:",
    "username": "",
    "password": "",
    "host": "",
    "hostname": "",
    "port": "",
    "pathname": "/C:",
    "search": "",
    "hash": ""
  },

I will work on it tonight. Thanks for pointing it :) @rmisev

@refack
Copy link
Contributor

refack commented May 3, 2017

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-commit/9600/
(Interested how it behaves on Windows...)

src/node_url.cc Outdated
if ((!IsWindowsDriveLetter(ch, p[1]) ||
end - p == 1 ||
(p[2] != '/' &&
if ((end - p == 0 ||
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The remaining means after ch, so p[0] must not be counted here. Correct to end - (p+1) == 0 or just end - p == 1

There is an example, which explains the term remaining: https://url.spec.whatwg.org/#remaining

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I see it works! Thanks for your comment :)

src/node_url.cc Outdated
(p[2] != '/' &&
if ((end - p == 0 ||
!IsWindowsDriveLetter(ch, p[1]) ||
(end - p >= 2 &&
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The same as above: end - (p+1) >= 2 or just end - p >= 3

@addaleax
Copy link
Member

addaleax commented May 3, 2017

The last CI doesn’t look so good… :/

@watilde
Copy link
Member Author

watilde commented May 3, 2017

@addaleax Yeah sorry, I was WIP at the time without the wip label. I pushed the fix with the review comments, but will recheck it tonight.

@addaleax
Copy link
Member

addaleax commented May 3, 2017

Okay, new CI then: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-commit/9608/ :)

src/node_url.cc Outdated
if ((!IsWindowsDriveLetter(ch, p[1]) ||
end - p == 1 ||
(p[2] != '/' &&
if ((end - p == 1 ||
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Depending on the spec writer's intention (whatwg/url#308) changing end - p == 1 to end - p <= 1 might be more robust to cover ch == kEOL as well, but in any case it shouldn't matter since the case when ch == kEOL is covered in another case already. Also, nice catch on noticing the end - p == 1 in the original code should actually be end - p == 2 👍

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems like they agree with me.

We can also calculate per iteration an actual remaining variable, like we are already doing for some other functions in the file. This should eliminate any confusion around this variable. The most correct implementation would be something like const size_t remaining = end == pointer ? 0 : (end - pointer - 1);.

Copy link
Member Author

@watilde watilde May 4, 2017

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Woo that'd be nice! I'm going to update it 😺

it's gonna be like

const size_t remaining = end == pointer ? 0 : (end - pointer - 1);

......

if ((remaining == 0 ||
      !IsWindowsDriveLetter(ch, p[1]) ||
      (remaining >= 2 &&
       p[2] != '/' &&
       p[2] != '\\' &&
       p[2] != '?' &&
       p[2] != '#'))) {

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I replaced end - pointer with remaining I added.

`C|` should not satisfy the condition to not copy
the base's path. It also synchronises WPT url test data
to verify the update in upstream.

Refs: whatwg/url#305
Refs: web-platform-tests/wpt#5754
@watilde
Copy link
Member Author

watilde commented May 4, 2017

Copy link
Member

@TimothyGu TimothyGu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@TimothyGu
Copy link
Member

Landed in 943dd5f.

@TimothyGu TimothyGu closed this May 5, 2017
TimothyGu pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 5, 2017
`C|` should not satisfy the condition to not copy
the base's path. It also synchronises WPT url test data
to verify the update in upstream.

PR-URL: #12808
Refs: whatwg/url#305
Refs: web-platform-tests/wpt#5754
Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Timothy Gu <[email protected]>
@watilde watilde deleted the feature/file-url branch May 5, 2017 05:20
anchnk pushed a commit to anchnk/node that referenced this pull request May 6, 2017
`C|` should not satisfy the condition to not copy
the base's path. It also synchronises WPT url test data
to verify the update in upstream.

PR-URL: nodejs#12808
Refs: whatwg/url#305
Refs: web-platform-tests/wpt#5754
Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Timothy Gu <[email protected]>
watilde added a commit to watilde/node that referenced this pull request May 7, 2017
`C|` should not satisfy the condition to not copy
the base's path. It also synchronises WPT url test data
to verify the update in upstream.

PR-URL: nodejs#12808
Refs: whatwg/url#305
Refs: web-platform-tests/wpt#5754
Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Timothy Gu <[email protected]>
watilde added a commit that referenced this pull request May 12, 2017
`C|` should not satisfy the condition to not copy
the base's path. It also synchronises WPT url test data
to verify the update in upstream.

PR-URL: #12808
Refs: whatwg/url#305
Refs: web-platform-tests/wpt#5754
Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Timothy Gu <[email protected]>
@jasnell jasnell mentioned this pull request May 11, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
c++ Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++. whatwg-url Issues and PRs related to the WHATWG URL implementation.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants