Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

src: describe what NODE_MODULE_VERSION is for #10414

Closed

Conversation

sam-github
Copy link
Contributor

Current comment described what to do with it when the ABI changes, but
implied that node would load modules with newere ABI numbers, which it
will not.

Checklist
  • commit message follows commit guidelines
Affected core subsystem(s)

src

Description of change

@sam-github
Copy link
Contributor Author

@addaleax addaleax added the lib / src Issues and PRs related to general changes in the lib or src directory. label Dec 22, 2016
Copy link
Member

@addaleax addaleax left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM but there’s a commit message typo (newere)

Current comment described what to do with it when the ABI changes, but
implied that node would load modules with newer ABI numbers, which it
will not.
@sam-github
Copy link
Contributor Author

Typo fixed, thanks.

@Trott
Copy link
Member

Trott commented Dec 23, 2016

We're standardizing on ABI number instead of ABI version or some other formulation? I'm OK with whatever, but I want to make sure we pick one thing and stick with it everywhere. (I've changed an instance of ABI version to ABI number in #10419. There is an additional one in releases.md.)

Copy link
Member

@Trott Trott left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we need to change the comment below that now repeats a fair bit of this new comment?

@sam-github
Copy link
Contributor Author

We're standardizing on ABI number instead of ABI version or some other formulation?

I didn't intend to imply that, I just called it a number because it is, I'll change it back to be "version" in #10149

I really regret that modules got added to process.versions, but that's water under the bridge.

Copy link
Contributor

@thefourtheye thefourtheye left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Wouldn't ABI version be better, instead of ABI number?

jasnell pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 27, 2016
Current comment described what to do with it when the ABI changes, but
implied that Node.js would load modules with newer ABI numbers, which it
will not.

PR-URL: #10414
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Italo A. Casas <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <[email protected]>
@jasnell
Copy link
Member

jasnell commented Dec 27, 2016

Landed in 1257546

@jasnell jasnell closed this Dec 27, 2016
evanlucas pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 3, 2017
Current comment described what to do with it when the ABI changes, but
implied that Node.js would load modules with newer ABI numbers, which it
will not.

PR-URL: #10414
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Italo A. Casas <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <[email protected]>
evanlucas pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 4, 2017
Current comment described what to do with it when the ABI changes, but
implied that Node.js would load modules with newer ABI numbers, which it
will not.

PR-URL: #10414
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Italo A. Casas <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <[email protected]>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 23, 2017
Current comment described what to do with it when the ABI changes, but
implied that Node.js would load modules with newer ABI numbers, which it
will not.

PR-URL: #10414
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Italo A. Casas <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <[email protected]>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 23, 2017
Current comment described what to do with it when the ABI changes, but
implied that Node.js would load modules with newer ABI numbers, which it
will not.

PR-URL: #10414
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Italo A. Casas <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <[email protected]>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 23, 2017
Current comment described what to do with it when the ABI changes, but
implied that Node.js would load modules with newer ABI numbers, which it
will not.

PR-URL: #10414
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Italo A. Casas <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <[email protected]>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 24, 2017
Current comment described what to do with it when the ABI changes, but
implied that Node.js would load modules with newer ABI numbers, which it
will not.

PR-URL: #10414
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Italo A. Casas <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <[email protected]>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 24, 2017
Current comment described what to do with it when the ABI changes, but
implied that Node.js would load modules with newer ABI numbers, which it
will not.

PR-URL: #10414
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Italo A. Casas <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <[email protected]>
This was referenced Jan 24, 2017
@sam-github sam-github deleted the complete-modules-version-comment branch January 25, 2017 21:10
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 31, 2017
Current comment described what to do with it when the ABI changes, but
implied that Node.js would load modules with newer ABI numbers, which it
will not.

PR-URL: #10414
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Italo A. Casas <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <[email protected]>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 1, 2017
Current comment described what to do with it when the ABI changes, but
implied that Node.js would load modules with newer ABI numbers, which it
will not.

PR-URL: #10414
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Italo A. Casas <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lib / src Issues and PRs related to general changes in the lib or src directory.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants