Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

meta: create a low traffic mailing list for PSAs to Collaborators (and interested parties) #16963

Closed
refack opened this issue Nov 12, 2017 · 12 comments
Labels
meta Issues and PRs related to the general management of the project.

Comments

@refack
Copy link
Contributor

refack commented Nov 12, 2017

  • Subsystem: meta

From time to time (should be less than one a week) comes a piece of news that should be broadcasted to all Collaborators. For example tweaks to the process, improvements, or temporary perturbations.
Currently communications are fragmented between GitHub, IRC, and even Twitter, and with that there is no "formal" channel for such announcements.
I suggest creating a mailing list that will include all Collaborators (and anyone else who wants to opt in) exclusively for this purpose. In order to keep people attentive to this list I suggest it will be opt-out to all collaborators, and either be writable only to a small group, or have explicit publishing rules.

Recent examples, and FYIs:

/CC @nodejs/collaborators and @nodejs/community-committee

@refack refack added the meta Issues and PRs related to the general management of the project. label Nov 12, 2017
@refack
Copy link
Contributor Author

refack commented Nov 12, 2017

I volunteer to champion this if we have consensus

@seishun
Copy link
Contributor

seishun commented Nov 12, 2017

I don't see much point in this given @nodejs/collaborators.

@benjamingr
Copy link
Member

@seishun nodejs/collaborators is really noisy and it would save me (personally) time. So I'm +1 on it.

@Tiriel
Copy link
Contributor

Tiriel commented Nov 12, 2017

And for those of us who are not collaborators (yet?) but wanting to get involved, it would be really cool too.
+1

@bnoordhuis
Copy link
Member

Not a fan. Multiple communication channels lead to fragmented discussion. I remember nodejs-dev@ and that was when the project was a fraction of its current size.

@Tiriel
Copy link
Contributor

Tiriel commented Nov 12, 2017

Well, from what I understand, it would be an announcement list only.
That is, if it's an information list only, for dispatching informations without actually commenting them, we'd still have to come on the issues to interact.

But having a digest of some sort juste like that would be a real help IMHO. We're all being flooded by GitHub notifications I think, this could be made to stand out more and keep us well informed.

@refack
Copy link
Contributor Author

refack commented Nov 12, 2017

Multiple communication channels lead to fragmented discussion.

from what I understand, it would be an announcement list only.

I agree that the goal is to defragment communication...

  1. it should be announcement only (so not a mailing list in the classical sense)
  2. low traffic, and no replies
  3. It could be a side-band channel for announcing special labelled issues.

@MylesBorins
Copy link
Contributor

I would like to see something better than @nodejs/collaborators
There is currently no way to filter specific group mentions with github notifications, so any noticiation to collaborators usually gets lost in hundreds of other notifications (for me)

@targos
Copy link
Member

targos commented Nov 17, 2017

This could be one of the requirements for our future communication tool: the ability to do general announcements and make them visible.

@joyeecheung
Copy link
Member

joyeecheung commented Nov 18, 2017

We can also make a weekly newsletter that grabs issues/PRs labeled with certain labels each weak and summaries those, pretty much like how the tsc-review/tsc-agenda work. If it's no-reply then a newletter looks more suitable.

@joyeecheung
Copy link
Member

cc @nodejs/community-committee I think this is related to commcomm?

@BridgeAR
Copy link
Member

Seems like github team discussions are the actual solution to this. Closing therefore.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
meta Issues and PRs related to the general management of the project.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

9 participants