Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
async_hooks: only disable promise hook if wanted
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
The promise hook has been disabled asynchronously in order to solve
issues when an async hook is disabled during a microtask.

This means that after scheduling the disable-promise-hook call,
attempts to enable it synchronously will later be unintentionally
overridden.

In order to solve this, make sure that the promise hooks are still
no longer desired at the time at which we would disable them.

Fixes: #27585

PR-URL: #27590
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
  • Loading branch information
addaleax authored and targos committed May 13, 2019
1 parent 74046ce commit e74e661
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 3 changed files with 36 additions and 11 deletions.
17 changes: 15 additions & 2 deletions lib/internal/async_hooks.js
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -69,6 +69,7 @@ const active_hooks = {
};

const { registerDestroyHook } = async_wrap;
const { enqueueMicrotask } = internalBinding('task_queue');

// Each constant tracks how many callbacks there are for any given step of
// async execution. These are tracked so if the user didn't include callbacks
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -231,14 +232,26 @@ function restoreActiveHooks() {
}


let wantPromiseHook = false;
function enableHooks() {
enablePromiseHook();
async_hook_fields[kCheck] += 1;

wantPromiseHook = true;
enablePromiseHook();
}

function disableHooks() {
disablePromiseHook();
async_hook_fields[kCheck] -= 1;

wantPromiseHook = false;
// Delay the call to `disablePromiseHook()` because we might currently be
// between the `before` and `after` calls of a Promise.
enqueueMicrotask(disablePromiseHookIfNecessary);
}

function disablePromiseHookIfNecessary() {
if (!wantPromiseHook)
disablePromiseHook();
}

// Internal Embedder API //
Expand Down
13 changes: 4 additions & 9 deletions src/async_wrap.cc
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -334,15 +334,10 @@ static void EnablePromiseHook(const FunctionCallbackInfo<Value>& args) {
static void DisablePromiseHook(const FunctionCallbackInfo<Value>& args) {
Isolate* isolate = args.GetIsolate();

// Delay the call to `RemovePromiseHook` because we might currently be
// between the `before` and `after` calls of a Promise.
isolate->EnqueueMicrotask([](void* data) {
// The per-Isolate API provides no way of knowing whether there are multiple
// users of the PromiseHook. That hopefully goes away when V8 introduces
// a per-context API.
Isolate* isolate = static_cast<Isolate*>(data);
isolate->SetPromiseHook(nullptr);
}, static_cast<void*>(isolate));
// The per-Isolate API provides no way of knowing whether there are multiple
// users of the PromiseHook. That hopefully goes away when V8 introduces
// a per-context API.
isolate->SetPromiseHook(nullptr);
}


Expand Down
17 changes: 17 additions & 0 deletions test/parallel/test-async-hooks-enable-disable-enable.js
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
'use strict';
const common = require('../common');
const assert = require('assert');
const async_hooks = require('async_hooks');

// Regression test for https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/27585.

async_hooks.createHook({ init: () => {} }).enable().disable().enable();
async_hooks.createHook({ init: () => {} }).enable();

async function main() {
const initialAsyncId = async_hooks.executionAsyncId();
await 0;
assert.notStrictEqual(async_hooks.executionAsyncId(), initialAsyncId);
}

main().then(common.mustCall());

0 comments on commit e74e661

Please sign in to comment.