-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix: module compilation within termux-app on android #1340
Conversation
addon.gypi
Outdated
[ 'OS == "android"', { | ||
'cflags': [ '-fPIC' ], | ||
'cflags_cc': ['-fPIC' ], | ||
}], |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You can fold this into the previous condition: OS in "android freebsd ..."
. You don't need to add it to cflags_cc
because cflags
is for both C and C++ code.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@bnoordhuis thanks for your comment. Your proposal was my first attemp to fix it, but it didn't. To verify if I didn't make any mistake I just did some testing:
- with 'cflags_cc': ['-fPIC' ] it compiles
- without 'cflags_cc': ['-fPIC' ] it does not
I think I have to compare the verbose outputs in more detail to figure out what happens. Any ideas?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
env V=1 node-gyp rebuild
turns on verbose compilation mode (i.e., prints the compile commands.)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is the compiler command for the variant without ccflags_cc. It seems that the -fPIE
after the first -fPIC
creates and unlinkable shared library on android.
... -fPIC -Wall -Wextra -Wno-unused-parameter -O3 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fPIE -fno-rtti ...
With ccflags_cc the command is build like that. It seems, that the later -fPIC
overrides the preceding -fPIE
so that it produces the right shared library.
... -fPIC -Wall -Wextra -Wno-unused-parameter -O3 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fPIE -fPIC -fno-rtti ...
With this result I would rather try to remove the -fPIE
while compiling shared libraries on android. I added an additional entry in target_condition
for removing -fPIE
like shown below. That did the trick and produces the following compiler command.
... -fPIC -Wall -Wextra -Wno-unused-parameter -O3 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fno-rtti ...
Excerpt of my local addon.gypi
:
'target_conditions': [
...
['library=="shared_library"', {
'conditions': [
[ 'OS=="android"', {
'cflags!': [ '-fPIE' ],
}]
]
}],
...
]
@bnoordhuis, what is your comment on this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah, you're probably getting hit by #1118 - that -fPIE
flag is not set by node-gyp, it's inherited from node's common.gypi.
The right thing to do until #1118 is resolved is probably to suppress the flag in node-gyp's addon.gypi.
It must have been broken for quite a while because that flag was added 20 months ago in nodejs/node#5544.
addon.gypi
Outdated
@@ -52,6 +52,14 @@ | |||
'standalone_static_library': '<(standalone_static_library)' | |||
}], | |||
|
|||
['library=="shared_library"', { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think you want to unset -fPIE
unconditionally, otherwise it's still going to be problematic with add-ons that also build static libraries.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok. So we only want to remove the flag if we don't want to compile an executable. Am I right?
LGTM, thanks. CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/nodegyp-test-pull-request/42/ You don't even need to special-case on |
@bnoordhuis, when can I expect it to be merged and published? |
We don't release that often and it also takes a while for new versions of node-gyp make it into npm and node. I can merge it but can you squash your commits and write up a nice commit log? If you want to show up under your real name instead of arrkiin, please do |
Hey folks. Would love to see this merged. Running into this issue currently. :) |
Hey @bnoordhuis, sorry for the long delay. After your message I asked myself how to proceed and forgot to continue. In the meantime I used my own fork to do the experiments under termux. Until now I didn't see any problems. Today I just found some time to squash the commits and add my forename. |
I can second that. |
PR-URL: #1340 Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <[email protected]>
Description of change
To solve the problem of linking a compiled module against a preinstalled library of termux-app on android I added a special condition branch to add the required -fPIC flag for the c and c++ compiler. After that everything compiled, linked and works as expected.