Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 28, 2020. It is now read-only.

Meeting at NodeConf EU '17 to discuss Node.js performance #124

Closed
bmeurer opened this issue Jul 27, 2017 · 17 comments
Closed

Meeting at NodeConf EU '17 to discuss Node.js performance #124

bmeurer opened this issue Jul 27, 2017 · 17 comments

Comments

@bmeurer
Copy link
Member

bmeurer commented Jul 27, 2017

I'd like to propose some kind of informal meeting at NodeConf EU in November to discuss various aspects of Node.js performance, specially how to track performance and how to prioritize potential work items. One of the main items here is obviously the need for benchmarks, ideally a standardized benchmark suite that is representative of common JavaScript workloads on the Node.js side.

Background here is that for V8 it's currently difficult to properly include Node.js concerns when it comes to planning around performance optimizations. Similarly the lack of a standard benchmark suite made it difficult for Node.js to decide on whether or not to use a certain V8 version for a given Node.js release (as we've experienced with Node 8 and V8 5.8 to 6.1 now). Being able to plan in advance and properly include important concerns for Node.js use cases would reduce the pain for everyone significantly, and I think an in-person meeting would help a lot here.

I'll be at NodeConf EU together with @psmarshall, who's been working a lot on Node.js performance recently.

@mcollina
Copy link
Member

If we want this conversation happening, I think we can make a room available for the meeting.

@bmeurer
Copy link
Member Author

bmeurer commented Jul 27, 2017

@jaro-sevcik from the V8 compiler team is also going to join.

@mhdawson
Copy link
Member

mhdawson commented Aug 1, 2017

I'm going to be at NodeConfEU and Arunesh will be there but none of the other benchmarking WG members will be that we know of. Node Interactive might be better but those on the last call are still not sure.

I'm thinking we should set up an on-line meeting to get started on discussion. I'm out next week so how about we send out a doodle for the week of Aug 21st.

@bmeurer
Copy link
Member Author

bmeurer commented Aug 2, 2017

I'm on vacation that week, but maybe we can do it the week after?

@kunalspathak
Copy link
Member

People who are interested, please share your availability in week of August 28th at https://doodle.com/poll/byewa29dzkmx8xf3

@bmeurer
Copy link
Member Author

bmeurer commented Aug 2, 2017

Thanks for setting up the Doodle. Unfortunately none of the time slots work for me currently.

@kunalspathak
Copy link
Member

What are the times you are available? I will include those as well in the doodle.

@bmeurer
Copy link
Member Author

bmeurer commented Aug 2, 2017

How about adding 6AM / 9AM / 11AM Europe/Berlin to the Doodle?

@kunalspathak
Copy link
Member

Updated.

@mhdawson
Copy link
Member

@bmeurer any chance you could make the next regular benchmarking meeting which is August 28 at 3 EST, 7 UTC ? It would be good to get some of you as regular attendees for the benchmarking WG meetings.

@bmeurer
Copy link
Member Author

bmeurer commented Aug 16, 2017

I guess so, yes. Is that 8:00 CET or 20:00 CET?

@gareth-ellis
Copy link
Member

21:00 CET (CET is currently UTC+2)

@bmeurer
Copy link
Member Author

bmeurer commented Aug 27, 2017

Ok, I'll join tomorrow. What's the Hangout id?

@kunalspathak
Copy link
Member

@mhdawson will publish it in #134

@mhdawson
Copy link
Member

@bmeurer hangout id has been added to the issue for the meeting. Sorry I just opened it today. It is:
https://hangouts.google.com/hangouts/_/ytl/n2RXGmmz6beAsiuZwuNL_YDoNjjD37o5pr6CARiLDhY=?eid=100598160817214911030

@bmeurer
Copy link
Member Author

bmeurer commented Aug 28, 2017

Thanks.

@mhdawson
Copy link
Member

mhdawson commented Sep 8, 2017

@bmeurer is now attending our bi-weekly meeting so I think we can close this. Please let me know if that is not the case.

@mhdawson mhdawson closed this as completed Sep 8, 2017
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants