Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Node.js Foundation Technical Steering Committee (TSC) Meeting 2018-08-22 #587

Closed
mhdawson opened this issue Aug 20, 2018 · 8 comments
Closed
Assignees

Comments

@mhdawson
Copy link
Member

mhdawson commented Aug 20, 2018

Time

UTC Wed 22-Aug-2018 12:00 (12:00 PM):

Timezone Date/Time
US / Pacific Wed 22-Aug-2018 05:00 (05:00 AM)
US / Mountain Wed 22-Aug-2018 06:00 (06:00 AM)
US / Central Wed 22-Aug-2018 07:00 (07:00 AM)
US / Eastern Wed 22-Aug-2018 08:00 (08:00 AM)
London Wed 22-Aug-2018 13:00 (01:00 PM)
Amsterdam Wed 22-Aug-2018 14:00 (02:00 PM)
Moscow Wed 22-Aug-2018 15:00 (03:00 PM)
Chennai Wed 22-Aug-2018 17:30 (05:30 PM)
Hangzhou Wed 22-Aug-2018 20:00 (08:00 PM)
Tokyo Wed 22-Aug-2018 21:00 (09:00 PM)
Sydney Wed 22-Aug-2018 22:00 (10:00 PM)

Or in your local time:

Links

Agenda

Extracted from tsc-agenda labelled issues and pull requests from the nodejs org prior to the meeting.

nodejs/node

  • stream-whatwg: add whatwg streams #22352
  • [WIP] fs: feature detection for recursive mkdir[Sync] #22302
  • process: add resolveSwallowed event #22218
  • util: expose promise events #21857
  • Password Hashing API #21766
  • tty: make _read throw ERR_TTY_WRITABLE_NOT_READABLE #21654
  • buffer: runtime-deprecate Buffer constructor everywhere by default #21351

nodejs/TSC

  • update charter #569
  • Tracking issue for updating TSC on Board Meetings #476
  • Strategic Initiatives - Tracking Issue #423

Invited

Observers/Guests

Notes

The agenda comes from issues labelled with tsc-agenda across all of the repositories in the nodejs org. Please label any additional issues that should be on the agenda before the meeting starts.

Joining the meeting

Zoom link: https://zoom.us/j/611357642
Regular password

Public participation

We stream our conference call straight to YouTube so anyone can listen to it live, it should start playing at https://www.youtube.com/c/nodejs+foundation/live when we turn it on. There's usually a short cat-herding time at the start of the meeting and then occasionally we have some quick private business to attend to before we can start recording & streaming. So be patient and it should show up.

Many of us will be on IRC in #node-dev on Freenode if you'd like to interact, we have a Q/A session scheduled at the end of the meeting if you'd like us to discuss anything in particular. @nodejs/collaborators in particular if there's anything you need from the TSC that's not worth putting on as a separate agenda item, this is a good place for that

@mhdawson mhdawson self-assigned this Aug 20, 2018
@Trott
Copy link
Member

Trott commented Aug 21, 2018

  • Proposal: add all new core modules under a scope? (too late for http2) #389

After the TSC meeting three weeks ago, @mhdawson commented:

In the last TSC meeting we discussed again, there were no strong objections.

Unfortunately, there don't appear to be minutes from that meeting and I don't see a video at https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCQPYJluYC_sn_Qz_XE-YbTQ/videos.

The minutes provide a few more details, but leave me unsure about:

Can that statement be interpreted as the following?: "The TSC is tentatively in favor of proceeding with namespacing for future core modules. Let's move to the implementation and code review stage. There is a possibility that we will reverse the decision and the implementation will not land, but for now at least, let's proceed and see what happens."

FWIW, here's how I see TSC sentiment in that issue. Please comment if I've misrepresented you or your view is not represented at all.

Yes, let's namespace! 6: @Trott @ofrobots @MylesBorins @targos @joyeecheung @cjihrig

Neutral-ish. 2: @jasnell @rvagg

Skeptical or solid "no". 3: @Fishrock123 @mcollina @addaleax

View not represented. 7 @fhinkel @mhdawson @thefourtheye @ChALkeR @danbev @gibfahn @TimothyGu

/cc @ljharb

@fhinkel
Copy link
Member

fhinkel commented Aug 21, 2018

@Trott, the meeting 3 weeks ago was cancelled because of Node Summit. The "last meeting" @mhdawson is referring to is this one: 2018-07-18

@Trott
Copy link
Member

Trott commented Aug 21, 2018

Thanks, @fhinkel! I thought he was referring to https://github.com/nodejs/TSC/blob/master/meetings/2018-08-01.md. As it turns out, both sets of minutes have small pieces of the puzzle documented in them. Completists will need to look at both. :-D

@mhdawson
Copy link
Member Author

My understanding on Proposal: add all new core modules under a scope? (too late for http2) #389

  • Several people are not a fan of namespacing but not concerned enough to block
  • As there are no objections, it can proceed and details will be worked out through the PR process.

And we should have removed from the agenda. @Trott since you added it to the agenda maybe you can remove it you agree.

@Trott
Copy link
Member

Trott commented Aug 21, 2018

@Trott since you added it to the agenda maybe you can remove it you agree.

Will do!

@Fishrock123
Copy link
Contributor

I would like nodejs/node#22352 (stream-whatwg: add whatwg streams) to be delayed until next week. I have a lot of investment in this subject, although I haven't gotten to commenting on the thread yet.

I also forgot that this was the early meeting and won't be able to make it tomorrow.

@Trott
Copy link
Member

Trott commented Aug 22, 2018

Moderation Team update:

  • Off-topic comments hidden and conversation locked for an old commit. Moderation issue 227.
  • An issue was locked and comments hidden. A Moderation Team member reached out to participants, unlocked the issue, revealed the comments, and left a comment to facilitate productive conversation. Moderation issue 228.

@nodejs/moderation @nodejs/community-committee @nodejs/tsc

@mhdawson
Copy link
Member Author

PR for minutes: #588

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants