Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Trade Mechanics should be a Separate Sub/Spec #1

Open
nobu-maeda opened this issue Mar 15, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Trade Mechanics should be a Separate Sub/Spec #1

nobu-maeda opened this issue Mar 15, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@nobu-maeda
Copy link
Owner

Trade Mechanics should be a separate spec and not part of XIP-01. This to emphasize that there can be many Trade Mechanics, and to be clear how much the change in Trade Mechanics can change the order and trade flow.

Trade Mechanic specifications should be clear what the state machine states should be on both the Maker and Taker side, and what event they should be waiting on before moving state.

Last but not least, a Trade Mechanic shall detail out what are the error and failure scenarios, and whether there's any means to retry or handle the errors.

@nobu-maeda nobu-maeda changed the title Trade Mechanics should be a separate spec Trade Mechanics should be a Separate Sub/Spec Mar 15, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant