-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 714
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add tests for preseq #99
Comments
For the preseq module, would we need to have another input file to use? From the user manual: Additionally, there's an error in the module where the $bam file is not preceded by a -bam prefix (since the default is a bed file). |
Good question @sruthipsuresh ! Yes, Preseq hasn't been updated in quite a while now and I doubt it will be anytime soon... Does it fail for single-end and paired-end data? Given the issues you mentioned I think it would be good enough to get it passing with single-end data only. May need to change the test data for this if required. |
It fails for both types of data unfortunately. I also tried creating a sorted bed file from the test bam files that we have already (as described here), but that fails as well. The single-end test does work with this sample file from the preseq repo- should this be used as the test data instead then? |
I think that's a good option, I couldn't find any test stuff last night in their repo good job! Ah this was just what I was looking for too! https://www.nextflow.io/docs/edge/script.html#http-ftp-files You should be able to use something like https://github.com/smithlabcode/preseq/raw/master/data/SRR1003759_5M_subset.mr for each of the files for input. So
|
I'll do that instead of adding the file to the input folder directly! Thank you! |
No description provided.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: