Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add no-UMI option #127

Closed
dladd opened this issue Jul 18, 2021 · 3 comments
Closed

Add no-UMI option #127

dladd opened this issue Jul 18, 2021 · 3 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@dladd
Copy link
Contributor

dladd commented Jul 18, 2021

It could be useful to be able to use bcellmagic on datasets without UMIs.

I was thinking of using the Greiff2014_Workflow data subset from the presto docs as a minimal/test example for development.
@ggabernet
Copy link
Member

Hi @dladd , that would definitely be a great option for the pipeline!

@ggabernet ggabernet added the enhancement New feature or request label Jul 19, 2021
@dladd dladd mentioned this issue Jul 22, 2021
Merged
19 tasks
@alaindomissy
Copy link
Member

I am very interested in such an option !

@ggabernet ggabernet added this to the Release 2.1 milestone Aug 12, 2021
@ggabernet
Copy link
Member

This issue has been solved by #128

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@alaindomissy @dladd @ggabernet