Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[BITV] 9.1.3.1h/3.1 - Modal dialog "File settings" - The input field for the WebDAV URL does not have a label associated with it programmatically. (2) #41835

Closed
JuliaKirschenheuter opened this issue Nov 29, 2023 · 1 comment · Fixed by #41916
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@JuliaKirschenheuter
Copy link
Contributor

JuliaKirschenheuter commented Nov 29, 2023

It is recommended to implement a visual label (e.g., "WebDAV Url") using the "label" element, which would be linked to the field using the "for" and "id" attributes.

https://report.bitvtest.de/default-en/cbedb5ef-4815-4cba-a83d-995599c178c3.html#checkpoint-fa5c8d46f9-v3-n1

9.1.3.1h/11.1 - https://report.bitvtest.de/default-en/cbedb5ef-4815-4cba-a83d-995599c178c3.html#checkpoint-fa5c8d46f9-v11-n1

@JuliaKirschenheuter JuliaKirschenheuter added 1. to develop Accepted and waiting to be taken care of accessibility labels Nov 29, 2023
@JuliaKirschenheuter JuliaKirschenheuter changed the title [BITV] 9.1.3.1h/3.1 - Modal dialog "File settings" - The input field for the WebDAV URL does not have a label associated with it programmatically. It is recommended to implement a visual label (e.g., "WebDAV Url") using the "label" element, which would be linked to the field using the "for" and "id" attributes. (2) [BITV] 9.1.3.1h/3.1 - Modal dialog "File settings" - The input field for the WebDAV URL does not have a label associated with it programmatically. (2) Nov 29, 2023
@ShGKme ShGKme self-assigned this Nov 29, 2023
@ShGKme ShGKme added 3. to review Waiting for reviews and removed 1. to develop Accepted and waiting to be taken care of labels Nov 29, 2023
@szaimen
Copy link
Contributor

szaimen commented Jan 5, 2024

a backport to 28 seems to be missing

@szaimen szaimen reopened this Jan 5, 2024
@ShGKme ShGKme closed this as completed Jan 8, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants