Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Swift Object storage returns 429 Too many requests #12189

Closed
asauray opened this issue Nov 1, 2018 · 5 comments
Closed

Swift Object storage returns 429 Too many requests #12189

asauray opened this issue Nov 1, 2018 · 5 comments

Comments

@asauray
Copy link

asauray commented Nov 1, 2018

Steps to reproduce

I used French provider OVH to reproduce

  1. Setup a Swift object storage container
  2. Use it a main storage

Expected behaviour

It should send file using the same token, and not call the POST https://auth.cloud.ovh.net/v2.0/tokens so often

Actual behaviour

It seems to be calling the Swift endpoint too often, which leads to http 429

Server configuration

Operating system:
Ubuntu 16.06

Web server:
Nginx + fpm
Database:
PostGreSQL

PHP version:
7.2
Nextcloud version: (see Nextcloud admin page)
14.0.3
Updated from an older Nextcloud/ownCloud or fresh install:
Fresh install

@nextcloud-bot
Copy link
Member

GitMate.io thinks possibly related issues are #4730 (Storage), #3248 (Using object storage is slow because of « 429 too many request » on objectstorage auth API), #6106 (Unable to delete 6GB file from external SWIFT object storage), #1504 (Support of Swift V3 Auth aka Identity v3 API for Swift Object Storage), and #4176 (Request for "/robots.txt" returns redirect).

@Arvi89
Copy link

Arvi89 commented Dec 23, 2018

Can we get updates on this issue? It's becoming a real problem for me, I can't look at my pictures in my auto upload folders because it makes too many requests.

@Arvi89
Copy link

Arvi89 commented Jan 12, 2019

Hello, anyone here?

@kesselb
Copy link
Contributor

kesselb commented Jan 12, 2019

If you use swift v2 this pull request could help you: #13140

@Arvi89
Copy link

Arvi89 commented Jan 12, 2019

This actually worked, thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants