You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
While using deck in our setup the use case for a separate "high priority" mark has shown up. The self defined colour tags are useful but lack some unique attribute to distinguish high priority tasks. For us it seems to be useful to be able to tag a card as "high priority" separate to the self defined tags.
A card marked this way could optionally be moved automatically to the top and / or be filtered by the upcoming filter features in #414
It could look something like this (with a better and more suitable design):
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
bpcurse
changed the title
Provide separate "high priority" tag
Separate "high priority" card tag
Feb 19, 2018
From my point of view using normal tags would be enough for that. You can just use one color for a high priority label, so it should be easy to distinguish and filters from #414 will allow you to sort them first/show just those cards.
While using deck in our setup the use case for a separate "high priority" mark has shown up. The self defined colour tags are useful but lack some unique attribute to distinguish high priority tasks. For us it seems to be useful to be able to tag a card as "high priority" separate to the self defined tags.
A card marked this way could optionally be moved automatically to the top and / or be filtered by the upcoming filter features in #414
It could look something like this (with a better and more suitable design):
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: