You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The situations where the need for this feature arise
To handle certain cases, either the excessive use of labels is needed or the excessive use of new columns.
Example 1: A task might have a label like Waiting for 3rd party. For finding tasks that can not be handled
right now, the label is a good solution. But to be able to filter for tasks that can be handled right now, either a
separate label should be created (e.g. No 3rd party involved) or an additional column (e.g. Tasks waiting for 3rd party). With both solutions additional activity is needed, while filtering for the absence of a label would
be enough.
Example 2: When a task have multiple labels some of which are orthogonal to each other, searching for
a task (with a combination of the mentioned labels) is either impossible or extremely cumbersome.
A requested solution
Please support filtering for the abence of a label.
Currently filtering is supported only for the presence of a label, i.e. a label is either ticked or not in the search dialogue,
'not ticked' being represented by a lighter tick.The absent (i.e. should not be present) state could be supported by adding a third state for the search dialogue as 'definitely not ticked' (i.e. crossed out), represented by a crossed tick or a cross with the
same intensity as the 'selected tick'.
Additional context
This would change the search logic for labels from the current, two-valued present/does not matter to a three-valued present/does not matter/absent version.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The only addition is the negation (NOT), so there are no additional AND/OR operations and so there is no additional need to support operator precedence and/or grouping/parenthesis.
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.
Support filtering for the absence of a label
The situations where the need for this feature arise
To handle certain cases, either the excessive use of labels is needed or the excessive use of new columns.
Waiting for 3rd party
. For finding tasks that can not be handledright now, the label is a good solution. But to be able to filter for tasks that can be handled right now, either a
separate label should be created (e.g.
No 3rd party involved
) or an additional column (e.g.Tasks waiting for 3rd party
). With both solutions additional activity is needed, while filtering for the absence of a label wouldbe enough.
a task (with a combination of the mentioned labels) is either impossible or extremely cumbersome.
A requested solution
Please support filtering for the abence of a label.
Currently filtering is supported only for the presence of a label, i.e. a label is either ticked or not in the search dialogue,
'not ticked' being represented by a lighter tick.The absent (i.e. should not be present) state could be supported by adding a third state for the search dialogue as 'definitely not ticked' (i.e. crossed out), represented by a crossed tick or a cross with the
same intensity as the 'selected tick'.
Additional context
This would change the search logic for labels from the current, two-valued
present
/does not matter
to a three-valuedpresent
/does not matter
/absent
version.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: