You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We need to add Project and Codescan Identifier fields to the Conclusions file for grouping Conclusion files by Project and tracking a Conclusions file back to the corresponding scan file/activity. Some key design assumptions / questions are:
Both fields are labels, i.e. not validated.
The overall logic is that one AboutCode Project may have multiple Codescan Identifiers where the latter identifies a Scan/Conclusions file. The use case is that there may be multiple Scan/Conclusions files - e.g. where the product codebase is in multiple repos.
Both fields should be stored at the Conclusions file level for ease-of-use and consistency across a Scan/Conclusions file.
It may make sense to enter/generate either or both fields during a scan where you might specify the Project in your scan parameters and ScanCode generates a Codescan Identifier.
For Codescan Identifier we need to think about possible confusion between an internal identifier in the Scan/Conclusions file versus the external filename.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We need to add Project and Codescan Identifier fields to the Conclusions file for grouping Conclusion files by Project and tracking a Conclusions file back to the corresponding scan file/activity. Some key design assumptions / questions are:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: