You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Having this officially supported would make using the newrelic cli on ARM machines with docker containers that little bit easier.
Describe Alternatives
The alternative is to simply build my own image via downloading the appropriate binary from the github releases.
Additional context
Basic scenario: Imagine having some ARM virtual machines that perform certain pipeline steps (self-hosted runners - GitLab, GitHub etc). There might be steps that want to use the newrelic cli (creating a change marker for a deployment for example). Having an ARM64 image or even better, a multi-platform image would make this scenario that little bit smoother by supporting a more diverse set of hardware configurations.
Thanks 👍
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks for inquiry @artlist-scottambrose. This seems like a reasonable ask. I can't provide an exact timeline, but we'll see where we can fit this in. 👍
Feature Description
The official newreliccli docker image on dockerhub only supports linux/amd64 https://hub.docker.com/r/newrelic/cli/tags.
ARM64 builds are available https://github.com/newrelic/newrelic-cli/releases/tag/v0.73.3 but there's no official docker image with ARM support.
Having this officially supported would make using the newrelic cli on ARM machines with docker containers that little bit easier.
Describe Alternatives
The alternative is to simply build my own image via downloading the appropriate binary from the github releases.
Additional context
Basic scenario: Imagine having some ARM virtual machines that perform certain pipeline steps (self-hosted runners - GitLab, GitHub etc). There might be steps that want to use the newrelic cli (creating a change marker for a deployment for example). Having an ARM64 image or even better, a multi-platform image would make this scenario that little bit smoother by supporting a more diverse set of hardware configurations.
Thanks 👍
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: