Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Better documentation on how to create an image based meta-analysis dataset from scratch #723

Open
jdkent opened this issue Jun 18, 2022 · 1 comment
Labels
documentation Improving documentation for the project ibma Issues/PRs pertaining to image-based meta-analysis

Comments

@jdkent
Copy link
Member

jdkent commented Jun 18, 2022

Summary

Cover the use case of an individual with a bunch of statistical images on their filesystem that they want to organize into a dataset.

Additional details

They would be able to create a dataset and use NiMARE

Next steps

  • add documentation
@jdkent jdkent added the enhancement New feature or request label Jun 18, 2022
@tsalo tsalo added documentation Improving documentation for the project ibma Issues/PRs pertaining to image-based meta-analysis and removed enhancement New feature or request labels Jun 18, 2022
@tsalo
Copy link
Member

tsalo commented Jun 21, 2022

TBH I wouldn't even know where to start with creating an image-based dataset from scratch, outside of using Neurostore eventually or writing the JSON file from scratch. What do you envision the process being like? Do we need a new non-NIMADS format that we can convert from, like how we handle Sleuth and Neurosynth/NeuroQuery files?

@tsalo tsalo changed the title Better Documentation on how to create an image based meta-analysis dataset from scratch Better documentation on how to create an image based meta-analysis dataset from scratch Jul 8, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improving documentation for the project ibma Issues/PRs pertaining to image-based meta-analysis
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants