Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

interpret_(): is creating the Rules set at each interpretation the best method? #15

Open
DominiqueMakowski opened this issue Sep 3, 2018 · 0 comments
Open

interpret_(): is creating the Rules set at each interpretation the best method? #15

DominiqueMakowski opened this issue Sep 3, 2018 · 0 comments
Labels
help us if you're reading this Help is needed to implement something what's your opinion Collectively discuss something

Comments

@DominiqueMakowski
Copy link
Member

Currently, each time you run interpret_p(0.01), it internally generates a Rules set. It seems inefficient. Would it be better to store default rules set outside? If so, how?
@DominiqueMakowski DominiqueMakowski added help us if you're reading this Help is needed to implement something what's your opinion Collectively discuss something labels Sep 3, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
help us if you're reading this Help is needed to implement something what's your opinion Collectively discuss something
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@DominiqueMakowski