using type.any() results in errors.

[codedmart]

No matter how I try and use type.any() I get errors. Say I have something such as:

var thinky = require('thinky')();
var type = thinky.type;

var Model = Thinky.createModel('orders', {
    id: String,
    charge: type.any(),
});

data = {test: "test", data: "data"};

new Model(data).save()
.then...

I get an error of cannot read property test of undefined or if I remove test from the object then I get cannot read property data of undefined.

Thanks

[neumino]

@codedmart -- I just tried your snippet, and it works fine for me.
Can you try to update thinky?

If you still get an error, can you provide the stacktrace? Thanks

[codedmart]

Hmm.... I am still getting the error. I forgot to add {enforce_extra: 'remove'} to my example. I am using thinky 2.0.5

Possibly unhandled TypeError: Cannot read property 'test' of undefined
    at /Users/bmartin/Work/lumi/node_modules/thinky/lib/document.js:459:69
    at Object.loopKeys (/Users/bmartin/Work/lumi/node_modules/thinky/lib/util.js:203:16)
    at Document.__makeSavableCopy (/Users/bmartin/Work/lumi/node_modules/thinky/lib/document.js:456:10)
    at /Users/bmartin/Work/lumi/node_modules/thinky/lib/document.js:472:44
    at Object.loopKeys (/Users/bmartin/Work/lumi/node_modules/thinky/lib/util.js:203:16)
    at model.Document.__makeSavableCopy (/Users/bmartin/Work/lumi/node_modules/thinky/lib/document.js:456:10)
    at model.Document._makeSavableCopy (/Users/bmartin/Work/lumi/node_modules/thinky/lib/document.js:414:15)
    at /Users/bmartin/Work/lumi/node_modules/thinky/lib/document.js:626:21
    at tryCatch2 (/Users/bmartin/Work/lumi/node_modules/thinky/node_modules/bluebird/js/main/util.js:51:21)
    at Promise$_resolveFromResolver [as _resolveFromResolver] (/Users/bmartin/Work/lumi/node_modules/thinky/node_modules/bluebird/js/main/promise.js:585:13)
    at new Promise (/Users/bmartin/Work/lumi/node_modules/thinky/node_modules/bluebird/js/main/promise.js:82:37)
    at model.Document._saveHook (/Users/bmartin/Work/lumi/node_modules/thinky/lib/document.js:616:11)
    at _asyncHook.executeMain (/Users/bmartin/Work/lumi/node_modules/thinky/lib/util.js:159:17)
    at tryCatch (/Users/bmartin/Work/lumi/node_modules/thinky/lib/util.js:59:5)
    at _asyncHook.nextPre (/Users/bmartin/Work/lumi/node_modules/thinky/lib/util.js:172:5)
    at executeHooks (/Users/bmartin/Work/lumi/node_modules/thinky/lib/util.js:194:5)

I use thinky this way:

// thinky.js
var config = require('./config').config;
var thinky = require('thinky')(config.server.rethinkdb);

module.exports = thinky;

// model.js
var Thinky = require('./thinky');
var type = Thinky.type;

var Model = Thinky.createModel('orders', {
    id: String,
    charge: type.any(),
}, {enforce_extra: 'remove'});

data = {test: "test", data: "data"};

new Model(data).save()
.then...

[neumino]

Hum, I'm a bit confused, I can't reproduce your error.

I tried this snippet and a few variants (changing the field name)

var thinky = require('thinky')();
var type = thinky.type;

var Model = thinky.createModel('orders', {
  id: String,
  test: type.any(),
}, {enforce_extra: 'remove'});

data = {test: "test", data: "data"};

var doc = new Model(data);
doc.save().then(function(result) {
  console.log(result);
}).error(function(error) {
  console.log(error);
});

The error seems to be that a field in the schema does not have the property _schema. While I'm not sure how to reproduce this, maybe the validation doesn't properly clean all the fields?

[codedmart]

I am sorry @neumino. I have not written out what I am trying to do very well.

// thinky.js
var config = require('./config').config;
var thinky = require('thinky')(config.server.rethinkdb);

module.exports = thinky;

// model.js
var Thinky = require('./thinky');
var type = Thinky.type;

var Model = Thinky.createModel('orders', {
    id: String,
    charge: type.any(),
}, {enforce_extra: 'remove'});

data = {charge: {test: "test", data: "data"}};

new Model(data).save()
.then...

Really what I want to do is use {enforce_extra: 'remove}' but have certain attributes such as charge that are an object that I want to save the whole thing without having to type out/list all the attributes in the schema. Does that make sense? Thanks!

[neumino]

@codedmart -- it should be fix in 2.0.6. Let me know if you run into other issues ;)