You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I would like to propose an enhancement to the library to automate the generation of SQL CHECK constraints, taking into consideration existing unique constraints. Currently, users manually specify CHECK constraints when creating tables, which can be cumbersome and prone to errors.
I suggest incorporating a feature into the library that simplifies the definition of SQL CHECK constraints. Users should be able to express constraints more abstractly, specifying the allowed values for a column without having to write the entire CHECK constraint manually.
Consider the following SQL table creation script with both UNIQUE and CHECK constraints:
CREATE TABLE "synthetic_table_with_constraints" (
"text_primary_key" TEXT PRIMARY KEY NOT NULL,
"column_unique" TEXT NOT NULL,
"column_check" TEXT NOT NULL CHECK (column_check IN('ACTIVE','INACTIVE')),
"created_at" DATE,
UNIQUE("column_unique")
);
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I would like to propose an enhancement to the library to automate the generation of SQL CHECK constraints, taking into consideration existing unique constraints. Currently, users manually specify CHECK constraints when creating tables, which can be cumbersome and prone to errors.
I suggest incorporating a feature into the library that simplifies the definition of SQL CHECK constraints. Users should be able to express constraints more abstractly, specifying the allowed values for a column without having to write the entire CHECK constraint manually.
Consider the following SQL table creation script with both UNIQUE and CHECK constraints:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: