Shouldn't ReusableSource have associated type for cell identifiers?

[netcosportsanatoly]

Astrolabe/Sources/Core/Reusable.swift

Line 46 in 29ca850

var selectedCellIds: Set<String> { get set }

[sergeimikhan]

@netcosportsanatoly could you please clarify what do you mean? Do you want to have a generic type for cells ids?

[netcosportsanatoly]

May be generic, may be not. It depends from class conforming ReusableSource protocol.
I would like to use enums or integers for views with static content.

[sergeimikhan]

1. It's really reasonable. 2. It will be really difficult to implement it with the current design of Cellable protocol. We will need to adjust it to also use generic type. And the most difficult point is the connection between Cellable implementation and Source to use same type of cell id.

If you have idea how to handle this, please share with us.

Thanks