Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Cloning Custom Fields does not clone anything #10304

Closed
dreng opened this issue Sep 9, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by #10313
Closed

Cloning Custom Fields does not clone anything #10304

dreng opened this issue Sep 9, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by #10313
Assignees
Labels
status: accepted This issue has been accepted for implementation type: bug A confirmed report of unexpected behavior in the application

Comments

@dreng
Copy link
Contributor

dreng commented Sep 9, 2022

NetBox version

v.3.3.2

Python version

3.9

Steps to Reproduce

  1. Navigate to "Other -> Custom Fields"
  2. Click any Custom Field in order to show its details
  3. Click the green "Clone" button

Expected Behavior

Some values of the cloned Custom Field should be adopted, at least Model(s), Type, Object Type, Required, Filter logic, UI visibility.

Observed Behavior

There's no difference whether you press Clone or Add (in Custom Fields overview). Cloning behaves just like adding a new Custom Field.

@dreng dreng added the type: bug A confirmed report of unexpected behavior in the application label Sep 9, 2022
@jeremystretch jeremystretch added the status: accepted This issue has been accepted for implementation label Sep 9, 2022
@jeremystretch jeremystretch self-assigned this Sep 9, 2022
@jeremystretch
Copy link
Member

It would make sense to enable this for custom links as well.

jeremystretch added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 9, 2022
Fixes #10304: Enable cloning for custom fields & custom links
jeremystretch added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 9, 2022
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 9, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
status: accepted This issue has been accepted for implementation type: bug A confirmed report of unexpected behavior in the application
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants