-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
index.html
4027 lines (3874 loc) · 142 KB
/
index.html
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<meta charset='utf-8'>
<script src='//www.w3.org/Tools/respec/respec-w3c-common' async class='remove'></script>
<script class='remove'>
var respecConfig = {
specStatus: "unofficial",
editors: [{
name: "Netage B.V.",
url: "https://netage.nl/",
}],
logos: [{
src: 'https://netage.nl/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Tekengebied-1.jpg',
href: "https://netage.nl/",
alt: "Netage B.V.",
width: 778,
height: 125,
}],
github: "https://github.com/netage/crr-sandbox",
};
</script>
<title>National Fire Data System - Community Risk Reduction Activity Data Model</title>
</head>
<body>
<h1>National Fire Data System - Community Risk Reduction Activity Data Model</h1>
<section id='abstract'>
<p>
This is required.
</p>
</section>
<section id='sotd'>
<p>
This is required.
</p>
</section>
<section>
<h2>Project Structure</h2>
<section id="introduction">
<h3>Introduction</h3>
<p>
Modern fire service agencies engage in many activities beyond responding to fires or even other types of
emergencies. Many fire service agencies actively engage fire prevention and other community risk reduction
("CRR") activities as part of their comprehensive, all-hazards mitigation and response, capabilities. While many
fire service agencies conduct these types of activities, there appears to be little consistency in how these
activities are documented or what types of data are created.
The NFPA and Netage cooperate on a project to develop a new data model for Community Risk Reduction (CRR). The
overall goal of this project is to develop a prototype data model. The National Fire Data System being developed
by NFPA is expanded for quality local and national data for CRR decision making. The project will convene subject
matter experts from the enforcer, public education, CRR, codes & standards, and data communities to identify
current best practices and existing data formats to develop a scalable, flexible, CRR data model.
This project will include 6 steps to develop the data-model on Community Risk Reduction over the course of 18
months:
<ol><li>Develop fire service use cases for diverse types of fire department activity data and stakeholders.</i>
<li>Evaluate the design and model of National Fire Data System architecture.
<li>Evaluate the model and adopted best practices from existing national and international fire data system data
models.
<li>Collect, evaluate, map, and consolidate existing examples of community risk reduction activity data from a
cross-section of American fire service (and related) organizations.
<li>Design, Develop and Launch a collaborative, extensible and scalable community risk reduction activity data
model using industry best practices.
<li>Design, Develop and Launch a collaborative, open-community, approach to facilitate contributions, sharing and
adoption of future changes and developments of data model(s).</li></ol>
</p>
</section>
<section id="deliverables">
<h3>Deliverables</h3>
<p>This document summarizes the relevant sources for the CRR Data Model development. It contains the
following deliverables in part or complete:</p>
<table border="1px solid black" id="table-formats-matrix">
<caption>Common formats for spatial data and what you can or can't achieve with them.</caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Deliverable</th>
<th>Inclusion</th>
<th>Link</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Del 1.1: Use Cases</th>
<td>Complete</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Del 1.2: Basis Use Cases</th>
<td>Complete</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Del 2.1: NFDS Best practice</th>
<td>Conclusion </td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Del 3.1: National and International Best Practices</th>
<td>Conclusion </td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Del 3.2: Supporting Files</th>
<td>Not</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Del 4.1: Existing CRR activity data</th>
<td>Complete</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Del 4.2: Supporting Files</th>
<td>Not</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Del 5.1: Data Model</th>
<td>Reference</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Del 6.1: Collaborative Community</th>
<td>Not</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Del 6.2: Execution Plan </th>
<td>Not</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</section>
</section>
<section>
<h2>Use Cases</h2>
<section id="use-cases">
<h3>Purpose Deliverable</h3>
<p>Use Cases are deliverable Del 1.1. They are part of the first step of this project to develop CRR use
cases to better understand a range of typical CRR activities and how they are documented. These use cases are
grouped and prioritized in Del 1.2 Basis Use Cases.</p>
</section>
<section id="quality-demand">
<h3></span>Quality Demands Deliverable</h3>
<p>Task 1: Develop fire service use cases for diverse types of fire department activity data
Goal: The goal is to identify key processes, workflows, systems and challenges that this project is anticipated to
impact. lt is expected that there will be many different and possibly conflicting use cases and that many uses cases will
be highly dependent upon the needs and whims of particular parties. Effort should be made to account for, aggregate, and
prioritize these various use cases to identify those for whom this data modeling will have the most impact and the
greatest benefit. Examples of stakeholders include:
<ul>
<li>Fire Departments</li>
<li>Local Government</li>
<li>State Government</li>
<li>Federal Government</li>
<li>Stakeholder Groups</li>
<li>For-Profit/lndustry Stakeholders</li>
</ul>
Deliverables: DEL 1.1 A written document with one or more of use cases of fire department activity data from
each of the six overarching stakeholder groups identified in Task 1.
Format: Written documents of a length and depth sufficient to cover the content.
</p>
</section>
<section id="method">
<h3>Method</h3>
<p>The presentations at Vision 20/20 Symposium, April 2018, provided a great sampling of cutting edge
programs across the US [1]. The day after the symposium a CRR Activity Data Forum brought together key
end-user groups, including the enforcer, public education, CRR, codes & standards, and data communities to
identify current best practices and existing data formats to develop a scalable, flexible CRR data model [2].
These two events were input to develop concept Use Cases based on a use case template [3]. Additional key
user contacts were asked to fill a Use Case template. To ensure quality the source/contact reviewed concept
Use Cases.</p>
</section>
<section id="method">
<h3>Short description of the Use Cases</h3>
<p><ol>
<li>CoSAT – smoke alarms, education & social help</li>
<li>Causal Chain Analysis – smoke alarms, education, campaign</li>
<li>Virtual CRR – internet survey education</li>
<li>Fire Safe Cooking – TLC cooking burners, education</li>
<li>Youth-Set Fires – professionalize FD</li>
<li>D-Drivers Blocking – professionalize FD</li>
<li>Statewide CRR – smoke alarm, FD support on CRR assessments & CRR plan, campaign, award</li>
<li>CLEAR team – increase knowledge on fire incidents to fuel prevention program</li>
<li>Sprinklers Incentive Act – legislate tax deduction for installation of sprinklers</li>
<li>MySafe:LA – educate, smoke alarm, canvassing, connect to neighborhood Councils</li>
<li>Multi-Family Occupancies: Tragedy leads to success – inspect multi-family occupancies</li>
<li>Positive Impact with Code Enforcement – inspections reduce Community Risk</li>
<li>Reducing Community Risk with emergency Response – CARES unit responds to low-acuity calls</li>
<li>CRR as a Department Cultural Change Tool – professionalize FD, FD Culture change, Community Risk
Profile, Fired Up to Read</li>
<li>School Inspection Effectiveness – inspections, school visits to prepare for inspection</li>
<li>CRR Radio – professionalize FD, campaign on CRR projects</li>
<li>Fire Prevention Messaging – educate</li>
<li>American Red Cross – smoke alarms, many different cooperations</li>
</ol>
</p>
</section>
<section id="detailsusercase">
<h3>Details Use Cases</h3>
<p>
<table border="1px solid black" id="table-formats-matrix">
<caption>Use Cases are detailed in appendices.</caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Use Case</th>
<th>Link</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>CoSAT </th>
<td><a href="#cosat">CRR use case #1 CoSAT</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Causal Chain Analysis</th>
<td><a href="#cca">CRR use case #2 Causal Chain Analysis</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Virtual CRR </th>
<td><a href="#virtualcrr">CRR use case #3 Virtual CRR</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Fire Safe Cooking </th>
<td><a href="#fsc">CRR use case #4 Fire Safe Cooking</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Youth-Set Fires </th>
<td><a href="#youthset">CRR use case #5 Youth-Set Fires</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>D-Drivers Blocking </th>
<td><a href="#ddrivers">CRR use case #6 D-Drivers Blocking</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Statewide CRR </th>
<td><a href="#statewide">CRR use case #7 Statewide CRR</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>CLEAR team </th>
<td><a href="#clearteam">CRR use case #8 CLEAR team</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Sprinklers Incentive Act </th>
<td><a href="#fsia">CRR use case #9 Sprinklers Incentive Act</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>MySafe:LA</th>
<td><a href="#mysafe">CRR use case #10 MySafe:LA</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Multi-Family Occupancies: Tragedy leads to success</th>
<td><a href="#multifamily">CRR use case #11 Multi-Family Occupancies – tragedy to success</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Positive Impact with Code Enforcement</th>
<td><a href="#firecodeofficer">CRR use case #12 Positive Impact with Code Enforcement</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Reducing Community Risk with emergency Response</th>
<td><a href="#emergencyresponse">CRR use case #13 Reducing Community Risk With emergency Response</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>CRR as a Department Cultural Change Tool</th>
<td><a href="#dcct">CRR use case #14 CRR as a Department Cultural Change Tool</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>School Inspection Effectiveness</th>
<td><a href="#schoolinspections">CRR use case #15 School Inspection Effectiveness</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>CRR Radio</th>
<td><a href="#crrradio">CRR use case #16 CRR Radio</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Fire Prevention Messaging</th>
<td><a href="#messaging">CRR use case #17 Fire Prevention Messaging</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>American Red Cross</th>
<td><a href="#redcross">CRR use case #18 American Red Cross</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</p>
</section>
<section id="stakeholders">
<h3>Stakeholders</h3>
<p><table border="1px solid black" id="table-formats-matrix">
Use Cases are detailed in appendices.
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Use Case</th>
<th>Fire Department</th>
<th>Local Government</th>
<th>State Government</th>
<th>Federal government</th>
<th>Stakeholoder group</th>
<th>For-Profit /Industry stakeholders</th>
<th>Others</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>1. CoSAT </th>
<td>X</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>State University, local resources</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>2. Causal Chain Analysis </th>
<td>X</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>3. Virtual CRR </th>
<td>X</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>X</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>4. Fire Safe Cooking </th>
<td>X</td>
<td>X</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>Local Housing Authority</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>5. Youth-Set Fires </th>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>X</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>State Department, State wide network of specialists</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>6. D-Drivers Blocking </th>
<td>X</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>X</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>7. Statewide CRR </th>
<td>X</td>
<td></td>
<td>X</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>8. CLEAR team </th>
<td>X</td>
<td></td>
<td>X</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>9. Sprinklers Incentive Act </th>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>X</td>
<td>X</td>
<td></td>
<td>Congressional Fire Services Institute </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>10. MySafe:LA</th>
<td>X</td>
<td>X</td>
<td>X</td>
<td></td>
<td>X</td>
<td></td>
<td>Mayor
City Council (15) American Red Cross Department of Aging
LA City Fire Department
LA City Attorney Neighborhood Councils
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>11. Multi-Family Occupancies: Tragedy leads to success</th>
<td>X</td>
<td>X</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>Police Department
Local Hausing and Urban Development
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>12. Positive Impact with Code Enforcement</th>
<td>X</td>
<td>X</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>X</td>
<td>Fire Chief
City Manager’s Office, City Finance/Budget Office
organized labor
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>13. Reducing Community Risk with emergency Response</th>
<td>X</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>X</td>
<td></td>
<td>Kaiser Permanente</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>14. CRR as a Department Cultural Change Tool</th>
<td>X</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>X</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>15. School Inspection Effectiveness</th>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>X</td>
<td></td>
<td>X</td>
<td></td>
<td>State Department of Education
State Fire Marshal Division
Schools
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>16. CRR Radio</th>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>X</td>
<td></td>
<td>Vision 20/20</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>17. Fire Prevention Messaging</th>
<td>X</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>18. American Red Cross</th>
<td>X</td>
<td>X</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>X</td>
<td>X</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table></p>
</section>
<section id="notdetailedusecases">
<h3>Not detailed use cases</h3>
<p><ol>
<li>Outreach</li>
<li>Wellness data firefighters</li>
<li>Operations</li>
<li>Incident</li>
<li>Firefighter exposure</li>
<li>Professionalize FD – clean gear</li>
<li>Professionalize FD – document your incidents & your CRR | Marion A. Long, NFIRS</li>
<li>Materials Generator</li>
<li>Develop and maintain FirstNet infrastructure</li>
<li>Health data civilians</li>
<li>Camera footage of incident</li>
</ol></p>
</section>
</section>
<section>
<h2>Basis Use Cases </h2>
<section id="basis-use-cases">
<h3>Purpose Deliverable</h3>
<p>Basis Use Cases are deliverable Del 1.2.They are part of the first step of this project to develop CRR
use cases to better understand a range of typical CRR activities and how they are documented. Deliverable Del
1.2 groups and prioritizes the use cases of Del 1.1.</p>
</section>
<section id="quality-demands-deliv">
<h3></span>Quality Demands Deliverable</h3>
<p>Task 1: Develop fire service use cases for diverse types of fire department activity data
Goal: The goal is to identify key processes, workflows, systems and challenges that this project is
anticipated to impact. lt is expected that there will be many different and possibly conflicting use
cases and that many uses cases will be highly dependent upon the needs and whims of particular parties.
Effort should be made to account for, aggregate, and prioritize these various use cases to identify those
for whom this data modeling will have the most impact and the greatest benefit. Examples of stakeholders
include:
<ul>
<li>Fire Departments</li>
<li>Local Government</li>
<li>State Government</li>
<li>Federal Government</li>
<li>Stakeholder Groups</li>
<li>For-Profit/lndustry Stakeholders</li>
</ul>
DEL 1.2 A written document that evaluates each of the use cases (or logical groupings of similar use
cases) from DEL 1.1 and identifies and prioritizes those that can be usefully addressed through the
creation of a scalable data model.
Format: Written documents of a length and depth sufficient to cover the content.
</p>
</section>
<section id="methods-basis-use-case">
<h3>Method</h3>
<p>Del 1.1 shows that CRR projects can vary significantly. Five types of CRR Use Cases form the basis for
most CRR Use Cases. Del 1.1 is grouped on these basis CRR projects. Del 1.2 describes the basis CRR
projects.</p>
</section>
<section id="intro-basis-crr-use-case">
<h3>Introduction Basis CRR Use Cases</h3>
<p>Most CRR use cases (Del 1.1) are based on 5 types of projects, Basis CRR Use Cases:
<ol>
<li>Inspections</li>
<li>House Visits</li>
<li>Education</li>
<li>Professionalize FD</li>
<li>Media Campaign</li>
</ol>
</p>
</section>
<section id="buildupbasiscrrusecase">
<h3>Basis CRR Use Cases build up CRR use cases</h3>
<p>Below you can find how each Use Cases is build up out of basis CRR Use Cases. Some Use Cases have
additional unique extra project parts which are mentioned in the “others” column.
<table border="1px solid black" id="table-formats-matrix">
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Use Case</th>
<th>Inspections</th>
<th>House Visits</th>
<th>Education</th>
<th>Professionalize FD</th>
<th>Media Campaign</th>
<th>Others</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>1. CoSAT </th>
<td></td>
<td>X</td>
<td>X</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>Identify needs</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>2. Causal Chain Analysis </th>
<td></td>
<td>X</td>
<td>X</td>
<td></td>
<td>X</td>
<td>Meet needs identified</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>3. Virtual CRR </th>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>X</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>4. Fire Safe Cooking </th>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>X</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>Install Temperature Limiting Control furnaces</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>5. Youth-Set Fires </th>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>X</td>
<td>X</td>
<td></td>
<td>Youth Fire Intervention Specialist</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>6. D-Drivers Blocking </th>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>X</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>7. Statewide CRR </th>
<td></td>
<td>X</td>
<td>X</td>
<td>X</td>
<td>X</td>
<td>CRR assessment
CRR results to request resources
Annual Excellence in CRR award
Support CRR plan
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>8. CLEAR team </th>
<td></td>
<td>X</td>
<td>X</td>
<td></td>
<td>X</td>
<td>Research on fatal fire incidents
Drill plan events
Fire sprinklers installations
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>9. Sprinklers Incentive Act </th>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>Research on fatal fire incidents
Drill plan events
Fire sprinklers installations
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>10. MySafe:LA</th>
<td></td>
<td>X</td>
<td>X</td>
<td></td>
<td>X</td>
<td>Canvassing: open fire stations for community
Events: food trucks, firefighter demonstrations, CPR education
Campaign: smoke alarm awareness month
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>11. Multi-Family Occupancies: Tragedy leads to success</th>
<td>X</td>
<td></td>
<td>X</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>Add legislation to allow FD easier access to multi-family structures</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>12. Positive Impact with Code Enforcement</th>
<td>X</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>Regular, repeated & false alarm inspections</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>13. Reducing Community Risk with emergency Response</th>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>CARES – different response process for low-acuity EMS calls</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>14. CRR as a Department Cultural Change Tool</th>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>X</td>
<td></td>
<td>Facilitate cultural change
Annual community risk profile
Fired Up to Read
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>15. School Inspection Effectiveness</th>
<td>X</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>16. CRR Radio</th>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>X</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>17. Fire Prevention Messaging</th>
<td>X</td>
<td></td>
<td>X</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>18. American Red Cross</th>
<td></td>
<td>X</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Count</th>
<td>4</td>
<td>4</td>
<td>10</td>
<td>5</td>
<td>4</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
The NFPA is not mentioned, but supported almost every use case. Each of these Basis Use Cases are described
in the next chapters.
</p>
</section>
<section id="scope-crr-programs">
<h3>CRR Programs</h3>
<p>During the CRR Data Model project many CRR programs contributed. Below a couple of CRR programs are
discussed this paragraph discusses whether the Basis CRR Use Cases cover the programs.</p>
<section id="scope-datapublication">
<h3>Greenville CRR Program</h3>
<p>The Greenville CRR Program is based on an analysis of fire incidents and resulted in an additional
components on education and inspection.
Basis Use Case: 1, 3
Extra Program: no
CRR Program: Greenville Community Risk Reduction
</p>
</section>
<section id="wilmingtoncrrprogram">
<h3>Wilmington CRR Program</h3>
<p>The Wilmington CRR Program is based on an analysis of fire incidents and resulted in home safety
visits and an inspection program. Wilmington has recently started documenting home safety visits.
Basis Use Case: 1, 2
Extra Program: no
CRR Program: Wilmington Community Risk Reduction
</p>
</section>
<section id="floridacrrprogram">
<h3>City of Sunrise, Florida CRR Program</h3>
<p>The City of Sunrise CRR Program is based on an analysis of fire incidents and resulted in three main
prevention areas: Medical/EMS, Fire and internal employee-related incidents. To reduce the number of
internal employee-related incidents a professionalization program was installed. To reduce the number of
medical repeat calls a Resource Access Community Paramedic program was created to provide personal
follow-up for certain patients (repeat calls or flagged). CRR program further consisted out of Education,
Media Campaign, Smoke alarm installation events, major street improvements, stronger fire-code
requirements and enforcement and professionalize FD.
One CRR issue has yet to be implemented due to budgetary constraints. The department has located 20
multi-residence apartment buildings housing mostly seniors, in which 1,100 unwanted alarms occur each
year. The primary cause of the unwanted alarms is smoke detectors that are too close to kitchen
appliances.
Basis Use Case: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Extra Program: Resource Access Community Paramedic program, Rewire smoke alarms
CRR Program: Sunrise_Florida CRR for NFPA DD2
</p>
</section>
</section>
</section>
<section>
<h2>Inspections</h2>
<p>Use case: 11, 12, 15, 17</p>
<section id="inspections-goal">
<h3>Goal</h3>
<p>What is the goal of your CRR project? When is your project successful?
<ul><li>Reduce the impact and severity of fires
<ul>
<li>Improve life safety</li>
<li>Ensure adequate exits</li>
<li>Reduce ignition scenarios</li>
<li>Provide automatic fire protection systems</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Create a fire code enforcement program that was cost neutral to city budget</li>
<li>Eliminate inspection backlog</li>
<li>Remove fire protection system annual test report review</li>
<li>Establish a routine inspection frequency for building occupancy types</li>
</ul>
Success:
<ul>
<li>Decrease of fires</li>
<li>Decrease of fire rate (number of fires per 100 structures) (state vs national rate)</li>
<li>Decrease of fire loss</li>
<li>Decrease of number of injuries due to fires</li>
<li>Decrease of number of deaths due to fires</li>
<li>Number of inspections</li>
<li>Less back log of inspections</li>
<li>False alarm inspections</li>
<li>Number of hazards identified</li>
<li>Number of hazards reduced</li>
<li></li>
</ul></p>
</section>
<section id="inspectionsmethod">
<h3>Method</h3>
<p>How is the project organized?
State and national structure (group) fire loss (NFPA) was analyzed and the program’s priorities were
developed based on the available data (preventable fire causes, area of origin). Close cooperation
between State Department of Education and State Fire Marshal Division.
Cooperation between Fire Chief, City Manager’s Office, City Finance/Budget Office and organized labor.
Staff training with the International Fire code.
Digitize the code enforcement process & digital official correspondence
Inspections by geographical grid instead of occupancy type
VFD collaborated with organized labor and created a new position called Fire Code Officer (FCO). FCO is
dedicated to fire code enforcement activities (inspections, permits, complaints, fireworks patrols,
etc.). FCO revenue is generated from the fire inspection fee schedule.
All VFD records (historical building/structural files, records, fire protection systems plans and fire
protection systems testing/maintenance reports, fire inspection notices, fire operational permits a.o.)
are digitized, providing immediate field access.
FD realized an inspection program for a specific group.
Determine actual locations
Set-up an inspection method and start inspections
</p>
</section>
<section id="crr-activity">
<h3>CRR activity</h3>
<p>What types of CRR activities do you utilize?
Identify common violations & solutions per type of structure
Training for structure owners on what to anticipate when their structure was inspected. Philosophy of helping
structure owners improve their fire and life safety.
<ul>
<li>Inspections</li>
<li>Re-inspections</li>
<li>False alarm inspections</li>
</ul>
</p>
</section>
<section id="target-data">
<h3>Target data </h3>
<p>Which data are used to target this CRR group?
Create current and accurate building occupancy portfolio: Structure group, Structure identification,
addresses, Building age, risk analysis.
Determine last known fire inspection within each geographical grid.
Analysis of (specific groups of) structure fires
Analysis of inspections type of occupancies and amount of structure fires in that type
</p>
</section>
<section id="activity-data">
<h3>Activity data </h3>
<p>Which CRR activities should be documented?
Structures visited
Type of visit: inspection, re-inspection, false alarm inspection
Hazards identified
Hazards mitigated
</p>
</section>
</section>
<section>
<h2>House Visits</h2>
<p>Use case: 1, 2, 7, 8, 10
Nog toevoegen: 18
House Visits are done by many FDs and therefore in many ways. Most of the time smoke alarms are installed. A
smoke alarm installation might be combined with safety education and sometimes with social help for low-income
households.
</p>
<section id="housevisitgoal">
<h3>Goal</h3>
<p>What is the goal of your CRR project? When is your project successful?
Objectives:
<ul>
<li>Reduction in fatalities as a result of fire</li>
<li>Maximizing resident (notably older adult) escape opportunities from fire</li>
<li>Engagement with community members provides an incentive to take responsibility for their own
safety</li>
</ul>
Success:
<ol>
<li>number of alarms installed</li>
<li>number of needs identified and met</li>
<li>number of hazards identified and mitigated</li>
<li>number of educations given</li>
</ol>
</p>
</section>
<section id="housevisitmethod">
<h3></span>Method</h3>
<p>How is the project organized?
The pre-event formative evaluation was a geographic, qualitative smoke-alarm targeting: older homes in
low-income areas. The mobile home parks targeted exist outside city limits which mean fewer resources are
available to these residents (“resource deserts”).
During these events, social work students from State University’s School of Social Work conducted an
informal, in-person assessment of the residents in the home. Their task was to identify needs the resident
has, beyond smoke alarms. Rather than applying a limiting model to this conversation, we allowed the
residents to self-identify their biggest need(s). This second formative evaluation guided our follow-up
efforts with these residents.
Discusses CRR planning with a diverse mix of political, first responder and support organizations: Mayor
(Crisis Response Team), the City Council (15 regional offices), The American Red Cross, Department of Aging,
Fire Department, City Attorney, Neighborhood Councils, and others. Triage of the needs of the most at-risk
communities in the city. It engages partners and creates better outcomes for a wider group of participants,
advocates and supporters. In a diverse series of neighborhoods, it engages the community via their own local
stakeholders improving results and creating an ongoing benefit beyond individual “canvassing” operations.
State Fire Marshall Office found a correlation among demographic characteristics and fire risk: income;
housing value; educational level. FDs lack resources for CRR. SFMO provides Risk assessments that empower
fire departments to implement CRR plans in their community.
</p>
</section>
<section id="housevisit-crractivity">
<h3>CRR Activity</h3>
<p>What types of CRR activities do you utilize?
<ul>
<li>Targeted smoke alarm Canvasses – State & FD create risk maps to identify high-risk homes to visit for
fire prevention education and smoke alarm installations.</li>
<li>Smoke alarm blitz / Get Alarmed – FDs join smoke alarm program focused on high-risk communities.
<ul type="a">
<li>Targeted wards</li>
<li>Post-fire neighborhood canvassing</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
Activities per house visit:
First visit:
<ul>
<li>Install smoke alarm</li>
<li>Give fire safety instructions (Education on safer smoking, cooking and heating practices)</li>
<li>Identify resident needs</li>
<li>Inform on help initiatives