-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Providing BG inputs with SPA syntax #190
Milestone
Comments
jgosmann
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 5, 2018
Closes #190. This does not allow connections to the basal ganglia input node in this style because this would require to allow SPA style connections to sliced inputs which is currently not implemented.
jgosmann
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 5, 2018
Closes #190. This does not allow connections to the basal ganglia input node in this style because this would require to allow SPA style connections to sliced inputs which is currently not implemented.
5 tasks
jgosmann
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 10, 2018
Closes #190. This does not allow connections to the basal ganglia input node in this style because this would require to allow SPA style connections to sliced inputs which is currently not implemented.
jgosmann
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 10, 2018
Closes #190. This does not allow connections to the basal ganglia input node in this style because this would require to allow SPA style connections to sliced inputs which is currently not implemented.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Both
and
do not work, but could potentially made to work. Not sure if it should be allowed (but we allow it for scalar SPA input in other modules).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: