You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
@angelosalatino I have opened an issue based on our discussion in #6
Do you have suggestion on making this part automated, so that every time we add a new item to the list, we can verify the sorting? I want the curation of this list to be minimal effort so that it has high coverage of content, and contributors find it easy to contribute.
What are your thoughts? Maybe just the sorted interface on the website?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In general, having sorted items helps users in browsing the list. Perhaps a sorted interface on the website would do the job. For each heading, we can alphabetically sort the items in its associated list.
I am wondering if keeping the unsorted lists on the README file will produce any harm for the curators in the long run.
Otherwise, a completely manual solution could be that we sort all the current items manually and then every new contribution, needs to be located in the right place and not just in append. This will sort both curator and user side.
@angelosalatino I have opened an issue based on our discussion in #6
Do you have suggestion on making this part automated, so that every time we add a new item to the list, we can verify the sorting? I want the curation of this list to be minimal effort so that it has high coverage of content, and contributors find it easy to contribute.
What are your thoughts? Maybe just the sorted interface on the website?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: