Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
exfat: fix potential deadlock on __exfat_get_dentry_set
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
When accessing a file with more entries than ES_MAX_ENTRY_NUM, the bh-array
is allocated in __exfat_get_entry_set. The problem is that the bh-array is
allocated with GFP_KERNEL. It does not make sense. In the following cases,
a deadlock for sbi->s_lock between the two processes may occur.

       CPU0                CPU1
       ----                ----
  kswapd
   balance_pgdat
    lock(fs_reclaim)
                      exfat_iterate
                       lock(&sbi->s_lock)
                       exfat_readdir
                        exfat_get_uniname_from_ext_entry
                         exfat_get_dentry_set
                          __exfat_get_dentry_set
                           kmalloc_array
                            ...
                            lock(fs_reclaim)
    ...
    evict
     exfat_evict_inode
      lock(&sbi->s_lock)

To fix this, let's allocate bh-array with GFP_NOFS.

Fixes: a3ff29a95fde ("exfat: support dynamic allocate bh for exfat_entry_set_cache")
Cc: [email protected] # v6.2+
Reported-by: [email protected]
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Sungjong Seo <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <[email protected]>
  • Loading branch information
Sungjong Seo authored and namjaejeon committed Aug 7, 2024
1 parent 30ab873 commit 913572d
Showing 1 changed file with 1 addition and 1 deletion.
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion dir.c
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -820,7 +820,7 @@ static int __exfat_get_dentry_set(struct exfat_entry_set_cache *es,

num_bh = EXFAT_B_TO_BLK_ROUND_UP(off + num_entries * DENTRY_SIZE, sb);
if (num_bh > ARRAY_SIZE(es->__bh)) {
es->bh = kmalloc_array(num_bh, sizeof(*es->bh), GFP_KERNEL);
es->bh = kmalloc_array(num_bh, sizeof(*es->bh), GFP_NOFS);
if (!es->bh) {
brelse(bh);
return -ENOMEM;
Expand Down

0 comments on commit 913572d

Please sign in to comment.