Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Trello node fails with 403 on GET operations #8713

Closed
faevourite opened this issue Feb 22, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed

Trello node fails with 403 on GET operations #8713

faevourite opened this issue Feb 22, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels

Comments

@faevourite
Copy link

faevourite commented Feb 22, 2024

Bug Description

All "get" operations like getting a board fail with a 403 error. It's likely due to this deprecation notice on the Trello API dev changelog. It suggests that the Trello node is sending a payload with GET requests.

Also, see this community post.

Part of the error:

ERROR: Forbidden - perhaps check your credentials?
403 - "\n\nERROR: The request could not be satisfied\n\n403 ERROR\nThe request could not be satisfied.\n\nBad request.\nWe can't connect to the server for this app or website at this time. There might be too much traffic or a configuration error. Try again later, or contact the app or website owner.\n
\nIf you provide content to customers through CloudFront, you can find steps to troubleshoot and help prevent this error by reviewing the CloudFront documentation.\n
\n\n\nGenerated by cloudfront (CloudFront)

2024-02-22-6UiXWJeD

To Reproduce

  1. Add a Trello node with a get, such as "Get Board"
  2. Provide a board id
  3. Test the step

Expected behavior

Should succeed. Now returns a 403 matching the one from the linked deprecation notice.

Operating System

Ubuntu via official Docker

n8n Version

1.27.2

Node.js Version

18.19.0

Database

SQLite (default)

Execution mode

main (default)

@faevourite faevourite changed the title Trello node fail with 403 on GET operations Trello node fails with 403 on GET operations Feb 22, 2024
@Joffcom
Copy link
Member

Joffcom commented Feb 22, 2024

Hey @faevourite,

It looks like someone has popped in a PR to fix this one so as soon as the CLA is signed by the user we will be able to get it merged in for a future release.

@janober
Copy link
Member

janober commented Feb 23, 2024

Fix got released with [email protected]

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants