Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Webhook Error with 0.221.0 #5765

Closed
luizeof opened this issue Mar 23, 2023 · 18 comments
Closed

Webhook Error with 0.221.0 #5765

luizeof opened this issue Mar 23, 2023 · 18 comments
Labels

Comments

@luizeof
Copy link
Contributor

luizeof commented Mar 23, 2023

Describe the bug

All requests arriving at the Webhook node are generating an error, but no log, no data. Simply the workflow is marked with error without any information.

n8n-io-Workflow-Automation

To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:

  1. Check Running Workflows
  2. Click on '....'
  3. Scroll down to '....'
  4. See error

Expected behavior
A clear and concise description of what you expected to happen.

Environment (please complete the following information):

  • OS: Docker
  • n8n Version 0.221.0
  • Node.js Version [e.g. 16.17.0]
  • Database system postgres
  • Operation mode queue

Additional context
Add any other context about the problem here.

@luizeof
Copy link
Contributor Author

luizeof commented Mar 23, 2023

A member sent me a log that he found.

IMAGE 2023-03-23 15:21:35

@tiagocordeiro
Copy link

Same here

Captura de Tela 2023-03-23 às 14 57 38

@Joffcom
Copy link
Member

Joffcom commented Mar 23, 2023

Thanks for the report @luizeof and @tiagocordeiro we will get this sorted.

Unrelated to this are you both running something like watchtower or was the upgrade done manually?

@eliasff
Copy link

eliasff commented Mar 23, 2023

Here the same, almost every execution is marked as "Failed". I have to open one by one to see if it's true or not

@devanshkaloti
Copy link

devanshkaloti commented Mar 23, 2023

Hi All,

Not sure if this is related but we're also getting "Problem running workflow -- require(...).Webhook is not a constructor" for all webhook connectors. 0.220.0. If it is unrelated, we will create a new issue.

Edit - Fixed in the 0.220.1 latest release

@netroy
Copy link
Member

netroy commented Mar 23, 2023

@devanshkaloti that sounds like a different problem. Can you please open a new issue, and add more details, including a stacktrace (if possible). 🙏🏽

@netroy
Copy link
Member

netroy commented Mar 23, 2023

@luizeof @tiagocordeiro Thanks for reporting this.
Can one of you please try this docker image? n8nio/n8n:0.221.1-rc

If this image fixes the issue, we'll create a new release 0.221.1.

@janober
Copy link
Member

janober commented Mar 23, 2023

Issue got also reported in the forum:
https://community.n8n.io/t/0-221-0-webhook-crashes/24446/2

@MeesJ
Copy link

MeesJ commented Mar 23, 2023

I can reproduce this issue on my end as well. n8nio/n8n:0.221.1-rc does not solve the issue on my end.

@netroy
Copy link
Member

netroy commented Mar 23, 2023

@MeesJ did you update the main server, the worker, and the webhook server?

@MeesJ
Copy link

MeesJ commented Mar 23, 2023

@MeesJ did you update the main server, the worker, and the webhook server?

I don't know what you mean exactly. I'm running n8n in a single instance, which is now running on the n8nio/n8n:0.221.1-rc image.

@netroy
Copy link
Member

netroy commented Mar 23, 2023

@MeesJ in that case the issue you are facing is something else. This issue only exists in the separate webhook server running in the queue mode.

Can you please open a new issue with stacktrace of the error you are seeing?

@goulahyane
Copy link

Experiencing the same with the latest image docker.n8n.io/n8nio/n8n.
Trying n8nio/n8n:0.221.1-rc and updating this thread accordingly.

image

@goulahyane
Copy link

goulahyane commented Mar 24, 2023

Update 1: i've tried 0.221.1-rc tag and it seems like the image is struggling to start.

Update 2: same issue on nightly.

Update 3: 0.221.0 is having the same issue as above 0.221.1-rc image.

image

@netroy
Copy link
Member

netroy commented Mar 24, 2023

@goulahyane @luizeof @tiagocordeiro Can you please try to upgrade to 0.221.1?

@luizeof
Copy link
Contributor Author

luizeof commented Mar 24, 2023

@netroy it works!

success

@netroy netroy closed this as completed Mar 24, 2023
@goulahyane
Copy link

Hey @netroy, just tested the latest pushed image, seems to be solving the issue.
Thanks for your reactivity guys!

@janober
Copy link
Member

janober commented Mar 30, 2023

Fix got released with [email protected]

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

9 participants