diff --git a/lib/views/help/privacy.html.erb b/lib/views/help/privacy.html.erb
index 40e06e31..73cdb1fb 100644
--- a/lib/views/help/privacy.html.erb
+++ b/lib/views/help/privacy.html.erb
@@ -110,6 +110,12 @@ address should be treated as the return address."
 <a href="http://www.ico.org.uk/for_organisations/freedom_of_information/guide/receiving_a_request">Hints for Practitioners</a> say
 <em>"A request must ... include an address for correspondence. This need not be the person's residential or work address - it can be <strong>any address at which you can write to them</strong>, including a postal address or <strong>email address</strong>;"</em>
 </p>
+
+<p>
+Paragraph 107 of the <a href="http://ico.org.uk/~/media/documents/library/Freedom_of_Information/Research_and_reports/recognising-a-request-made-under-the-foia.pdf" title="Recognising a request made under the FOIA">Information Commissioner's Guidance on recognising a request</a> under the Freedom of Information Act now contains a section specifically on <%= link_to 'WhatDoTheyKnow', frontpage_path %> which states:
+
+<blockquote>With respect to the address for correspondence, we consider the <code>@whatdotheyknow.com</code> email address provided to authorities when requests are made through the site to be a valid contact address for the purposes of Section 8(1)(b).</blockquote>
+</p>
 </dd>
 
 <dt id="postal_answer">No no, they need a postal address to send a paper response! <a href="#postal_answer">#</a> </dt>