Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Automatically open a hostname in the previously selected container (rather than Default) #322

Closed
option-greek opened this issue Mar 3, 2017 · 3 comments

Comments

@option-greek
Copy link

option-greek commented Mar 3, 2017

Automatically open a hostname in the previously selected container (rather than Default). This can be provided as an option. Advantage is that user doesn't have to make a conscious decision on which container to select for every new tab he opens. So once they open google.com in a user selected container, it will always open in that container alone (lets call it search) and next time user opens a new tab and types in google.com, it will go to this search container instead of the default one. This way users can just do Ctrl+T and follow their normal workflow after making a conscious decision earlier on where a certain host should open.

@groovecoder
Copy link
Member

This is convenient, but it can nullify some of the security protection of containers.

E.g., if Firefox always opens onlinebanking.com in your Finance container, then any click-baiting attack against that site could succeed, assuming you're signed into onlinebanking.com in the Finance container. When Firefox opens onlinebanking.com links into the default container, it isn't signed in.

I'd prefer something like #306 where the user has to make a more explicit action to assign domains to containers.

@option-greek
Copy link
Author

Agreed. #306 solves this use case as well! (upvoted).

@kjozwiak
Copy link

kjozwiak commented Mar 30, 2017

As mentioned above, work being done in #306 and #386 will solve this use case.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants