You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When there are multiple test cases, or complicated ones, it can take time to skim through and understand what the test case is accomplishing. If instead we included optional strings that printed out if the test failed, we could very easily understand what tests are doing and why they might have failed.
What is the issue?
When there are multiple test cases, or complicated ones, it can take time to skim through and understand what the test case is accomplishing. If instead we included optional strings that printed out if the test failed, we could very easily understand what tests are doing and why they might have failed.
For example, I have the test:
If this fails, it will get an error like
Min Row Count Error: 126 rows found, expected more than 10000 rows"
.But if I had a string to define the test, I could annotate it in the code and in the failure:
Which might fail with:
This would also help ID which
min_row_count
check failed, when I have multiple.How can we reproduce the bug
No response
┆Issue is synchronized with this Jira Task
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: