You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 17, 2023. It is now read-only.
This looks weird. If I drag from the bottom right past the top left, can we just invert the selection so the top-left corner becomes the bottom-right and I continue drawing my box? That would be the standard behaviour.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Yes, this is the behavior I intentionally implemented when fixing the problem of a selection collapsing to no height or width. The inverted selection is common, but I couldn't come up with a reason for it (outside of algorithmic simplicity). Instead this is intended as a way to kind of bump the selection.
With the current behaviour, it's doubtful that I'll get the top-left corner to end up exactly where I want it after one of the 'bumps' so I'll end up having adjusting it anyway - not sure it saves much time.
+1 @johngruen - stick with expected behaviour unless the new way provides some special utility.
I could see the current way being useful as a reset for the top-left corner, but not in it's current "jumpy" implementation. If you were able to move the top left corner smoothly as you moved your mouse, that might be useful.
This looks weird. If I drag from the bottom right past the top left, can we just invert the selection so the top-left corner becomes the bottom-right and I continue drawing my box? That would be the standard behaviour.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: