You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the config wiki, thread_auto_close is described as:
Time that has to pass after no reply from a user before the thread auto closes. If not set, thread will not auto close.
However, this seems misleading as the timer begins whenever a message is sent in a thread by anyone or when a note is added. This also produces undesirable behaviour. Examples:
A user contacts ModMail to request assistance. The ticket will be closed even if no reply is given at all.
A staff member replies and issues a ?close cancel to put the issue on hold. While staff member is unavailable, the user replies with additional info, which resets the timer and the ticket is closed before staff member gets back.
A staff member issues a ?close cancel and then a ?note. The timer is restarted and the ticket is closed.
Possible changes for this can be to completely disable the timer for anything other than a ?reply being issued by a staff member, or to add a second timer configuration for ?reply versus messages sent by the user in DMs. The ?note command should not be considered for this in both cases.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In the config wiki, thread_auto_close is described as:
However, this seems misleading as the timer begins whenever a message is sent in a thread by anyone or when a note is added. This also produces undesirable behaviour. Examples:
?close cancel
to put the issue on hold. While staff member is unavailable, the user replies with additional info, which resets the timer and the ticket is closed before staff member gets back.?close cancel
and then a?note
. The timer is restarted and the ticket is closed.Possible changes for this can be to completely disable the timer for anything other than a
?reply
being issued by a staff member, or to add a second timer configuration for?reply
versus messages sent by the user in DMs. The?note
command should not be considered for this in both cases.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: