Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Suggestions from the CK survey #132

Closed
gfursin opened this issue Nov 16, 2020 · 7 comments
Closed

Suggestions from the CK survey #132

gfursin opened this issue Nov 16, 2020 · 7 comments
Assignees

Comments

@gfursin
Copy link
Contributor

gfursin commented Nov 16, 2020

Here are some suggestions from our CK survey:

  1. moving CK to a foundation such as LF AI or MLCommons to provide better governance and community support
  2. changing license to Apache 2.0
  3. dropping support for Python 2 and keeping support for Python 3.6+
  4. rewriting CK to be more pythonic (on-going project in the CK incubator)
  5. including CK modules to the CK core to ensure the stability of shared workflows
  6. making it easier to add ML workflows (providing a GUI at cKnowledge.io)
  7. continue automating MLPerf: https://github.com/ctuning/ck/blob/master/docs/mlperf-automation/README.md
  8. adding more CK components and workflows for ML (BERT, DLRM): on-going
  9. collecting all CK components in one GitHub repository
  10. providing better intergration with existing tools and projects including Kuberflow and PwC
  11. adding super simple CK tutorials
@gfursin
Copy link
Contributor Author

gfursin commented Nov 16, 2020

I addressed suggestions #5 and #9 in the latest CK release V1.50.0:

@gfursin gfursin changed the title Suggestions from our survey about the future of the CK framework Suggestions from the CK survey Nov 17, 2020
@gfursin
Copy link
Contributor Author

gfursin commented Nov 17, 2020

@gfursin
Copy link
Contributor Author

gfursin commented Nov 17, 2020

Some notes about the new development methodology: https://groups.google.com/g/collective-knowledge/c/0cGOPNM1Uvw

@gfursin
Copy link
Contributor Author

gfursin commented Nov 26, 2020

Forgot to mention CLA: #135

@gfursin
Copy link
Contributor Author

gfursin commented May 6, 2021

We relicensed to Apache 2.0

@gfursin
Copy link
Contributor Author

gfursin commented Jun 7, 2021

We work with the community to revise, test, reproduce and stabilize MLPerf workflows: https://github.com/ctuning/ck/blob/master/docs/mlperf-automation/README.md
Don't hesitate to join this effort!

@gfursin
Copy link
Contributor Author

gfursin commented Mar 24, 2022

Many of these suggestions were implemented in the latest version of the CK prototype. CK is stable and has been successfully used by different companies and organizations to automate MLPerf inference submissions. That is why we have decided not to touch it anymore expect bug fixes in the CK kernel and existing MLOps components. Instead, we are developing a new CK2 framework based on user feedback.

I close this issue.

@gfursin gfursin closed this as completed Mar 24, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant