You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It would be nice to be able to mock a class with inline methods without generating warnings. The user may be aware of the limitations regarding inline members, but still want to mock regular members. In this case the warnings only create noise.
Would it make sense to either offer a variant of mock (with some name like mockWithInline) which silently ignores inline members, or to make the warning configurable?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It would be nice to be able to mock a class with inline methods without generating warnings. The user may be aware of the limitations regarding inline members, but still want to mock regular members. In this case the warnings only create noise.
Would it make sense to either offer a variant of
mock
(with some name likemockWithInline
) which silently ignores inline members, or to make the warning configurable?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: