Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use setuptools-scm to write correct version to version.py #737

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 14, 2023

Conversation

dekkers
Copy link
Contributor

@dekkers dekkers commented Apr 14, 2023

The version will be the version of the git tag or 0.1.dev1+g<git commit hash> when there isn't a tag.

Also add workflow itself to workflow paths so they tigger if the workflow changes.

Issue link

Please add a link to the issue. If there is no issue for this PR, please add it to the project board directly.

Proof

image
image


Checklists for authors:

Code Checklist

  • This PR only contains functionality relevant to the issue; tickets have been created for newly discovered issues.
  • I have written unit tests for the changes or fixes I made.
  • For any non-trivial functionality, I have added integration and/or end-to-end tests.
  • I have performed a self-review of my code and refactored it to the best of my abilities.

Communication

  • I have informed others of any required .env changes files if required and changed the .env-dist accordingly.
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation, if necessary.

Checklist for code reviewers:

  • The code does not violate Model-View-Template and our other architectural principles.
  • The code prioritizes readability over performance where appropriate.
  • The code does not bypass authentication or security mechanisms.
  • The code does not introduce any dependency on a library that has not been properly vetted.
  • The code contains docstrings, comments, and documentation where needed.

Checklist for QA:

  • I have checked out this branch, and successfully ran a fresh make kat.
  • I confirmed that there are no unintended functional regressions in this branch:
    • I have managed to pass the onboarding flow
    • Objects and Findings are created properly
    • Tasks are created and completed properly
  • I confirmed that the PR's advertised feature or hotfix works as intended.

What works:

  • bullet point + screenshot (if useful) per tested functionality

What doesn't work:

  • bullet point + screenshot (if useful) per tested functionality

Bug or feature?:

  • bullet point + screenshot (if useful) if it is unclear whether something is a bug or an intended feature.

@dekkers dekkers requested a review from a team as a code owner April 14, 2023 15:28
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

File Coverage
All files 65%
bits/definitions.py 64%
bits/runner.py 56%
bits/https_availability/https_availability.py 93%
bits/oois_in_headers/oois_in_headers.py 57%
bits/spf_discovery/internetnl_spf_parser.py 55%
bits/spf_discovery/spf_discovery.py 72%
octopoes/api/api.py 89%
octopoes/api/models.py 75%
octopoes/api/router.py 52%
octopoes/core/app.py 69%
octopoes/core/service.py 46%
octopoes/events/events.py 96%
octopoes/events/manager.py 65%
octopoes/models/__init__.py 86%
octopoes/models/datetime.py 66%
octopoes/models/exception.py 83%
octopoes/models/origin.py 70%
octopoes/models/path.py 99%
octopoes/models/types.py 95%
octopoes/models/ooi/certificate.py 96%
octopoes/models/ooi/email_security.py 95%
octopoes/models/ooi/findings.py 94%
octopoes/models/ooi/network.py 97%
octopoes/models/ooi/service.py 91%
octopoes/models/ooi/software.py 71%
octopoes/models/ooi/web.py 81%
octopoes/models/ooi/dns/records.py 95%
octopoes/models/ooi/dns/zone.py 77%
octopoes/repositories/ooi_repository.py 40%
octopoes/repositories/origin_parameter_repository.py 52%
octopoes/repositories/origin_repository.py 52%
octopoes/repositories/scan_profile_repository.py 45%
octopoes/xtdb/client.py 39%
octopoes/xtdb/query_builder.py 69%
octopoes/xtdb/related_field_generator.py 73%
tests/conftest.py 91%

Minimum allowed coverage is 75%

Generated by 🐒 cobertura-action against bb4b9e6

@dekkers dekkers merged commit a2f3222 into main Apr 14, 2023
@dekkers dekkers deleted the set-correct-version branch April 14, 2023 21:14
jpbruinsslot added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 17, 2023
* main:
  Update `pre-commit` dependencies and enable Ruff autofix (#739)
  Cleanup Rocky requirements (#729)
  Add (I) to ruff and fix imports (#723)
  Add port-common bit and KAT-OPEN-COMMON-PORT FindingType (#734)
  Use setuptools-scm to write correct version to version.py (#737)
  Enable and disable bits (#732)
  Scan level inheritance chain (#722)
  Octopoes origin param endpoint (#731)
  Do not propagate scan level from DNSSPFMechanismHostname (#721)
  Fix: Unnecessary white space within links (#728)
  chore/refactor katalogus settings setup (#542)
jpbruinsslot added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 17, 2023
* main:
  Update `pre-commit` dependencies and enable Ruff autofix (#739)
  Cleanup Rocky requirements (#729)
  Add (I) to ruff and fix imports (#723)
  Add port-common bit and KAT-OPEN-COMMON-PORT FindingType (#734)
  Use setuptools-scm to write correct version to version.py (#737)
  Enable and disable bits (#732)
  Scan level inheritance chain (#722)
  Octopoes origin param endpoint (#731)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants