generated from ministryofjustice/template-repository
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 290
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Migrate Shield count
rules to block
#7975
Comments
3 tasks
dms1981
changed the title
Migrate Shield
Migrate Shield Sep 30, 2024
count
rules to `blockcount
rules to block
Accounts that have a count action for their AWS WAFv2 ACL rules are: |
I have checked everything and it all looks good closing issue |
github-project-automation
bot
moved this from For Review
to Done
in Modernisation Platform
Oct 14, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
User Story
As a Modernisation Platform Engineer
I want to help customers implement AWS Shield in production environments
So that they are actively protected against DDOS attacks
Value / Purpose
AWS Shield Advanced is enabled by default across the Modernisation Platform.
As part of #7185 we helped customers to move any click-ops code across to infrastructure-as-code. Some customers have production accounts with
count
rules which will need to be changed toblock
for AWS Shield Advanced to actively protect in situations where traffic exceeds a predefined threshold.A significant number of customers will be managing their AWS Shield WAFv2 ACL rules themselves and so will not fall directly into this ticket, but if time allows we can check
*-production
accounts to see if any customers are currently usingcount
instead ofblock
after a suitable evaluation periodUseful Contacts
No response
Additional Information
The following accounts still appear to have
count
set for their AWS WAFv2 ACL rules as part of AWS Shield:cdpt-chaps
cdpt-ifs
equip
ppud
Definition of Done
count
being presentblock
after discussion with ownerscount
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: