💬 Decide how we should operate AWS QuickSight

[jacobwoffenden]

Background and context

AWS QuickSight is currently offered on a best endeavour basis.

It looks to have been provided at some point, but is not an official Analytical Platform component.

Recently we've had a few support requests regarding IdAM, and I'm wondering if it's worth revisiting if/how we provide this service.

User types impacted

Data (consumers) and Platform (administration) Engineering teams

Requested Feature

Formalisation of the administration and support of AWS QuickSight

Your usecase

Provide clarity to the consumers and administrators on the status of the service

Reference:

Analytical Platform technical documentation: https://silver-dollop-30c6a355.pages.github.io/documentation/80-archived-operations-handbook/40-common-user-support/Quicksight.html#how-to-access-quicksight-as-an-author

Recent support issue: https://github.com/ministryofjustice/data-platform-support/issues/126

[github-actions]

This issue is being marked as stale because it has been open for 60 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment to keep the issue open.

[github-actions]

This issue is being closed because it has been open for a further 7 days with no activity. If this is still a valid issue, please reopen it, Thank you!

[bagg3rs]

I am reopening this issue as we need to investigate and have an alternative BI offering and this one is part of AWS which makes securing access much easier. This also relates #1687

[github-actions]

This issue is being marked as stale because it has been open for 60 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment to keep the issue open.

[julialawrence]

This needs to either cover the new QS or closed.
@jacobwoffenden