We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Very nice work! During my training, I found that loss can become negative:
Train Epoch: 198 [0/100 (0%)] Loss1: 0.024868 Loss2: 0.022132 Discrepancy: 0.018226 Test set: Average loss: -0.0588, Accuracy C1: 9449/10000 (94%) Accuracy C2: 9509/10000 (95%) Accuracy Ensemble: 9554/10000 (96%) recording record/usps_mnist_k_4_alluse_no_onestep_False_1_test.txt Train Epoch: 199 [0/100 (0%)] Loss1: 0.012343 Loss2: 0.020431 Discrepancy: 0.030520 Test set: Average loss: -0.0581, Accuracy C1: 9419/10000 (94%) Accuracy C2: 9518/10000 (95%) Accuracy Ensemble: 9537/10000 (95%) recording record/usps_mnist_k_4_alluse_no_onestep_False_1_test.txt
Do you think this is normal?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I guess so.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Because the author used the nll_loss...
Very nice work! During my training, I found that loss can become negative: Train Epoch: 198 [0/100 (0%)] Loss1: 0.024868 Loss2: 0.022132 Discrepancy: 0.018226 Test set: Average loss: -0.0588, Accuracy C1: 9449/10000 (94%) Accuracy C2: 9509/10000 (95%) Accuracy Ensemble: 9554/10000 (96%) recording record/usps_mnist_k_4_alluse_no_onestep_False_1_test.txt Train Epoch: 199 [0/100 (0%)] Loss1: 0.012343 Loss2: 0.020431 Discrepancy: 0.030520 Test set: Average loss: -0.0581, Accuracy C1: 9419/10000 (94%) Accuracy C2: 9518/10000 (95%) Accuracy Ensemble: 9537/10000 (95%) recording record/usps_mnist_k_4_alluse_no_onestep_False_1_test.txt Do you think this is normal?
have you solve this problem?and If my pytorch version is 0.4.1.could I get the same peformance?
No branches or pull requests
Very nice work! During my training, I found that loss can become negative:
Do you think this is normal?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: