Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Installing Microsoft.Edge has bad UX #335

Closed
Bomret opened this issue May 26, 2020 · 2 comments
Closed

Installing Microsoft.Edge has bad UX #335

Bomret opened this issue May 26, 2020 · 2 comments
Milestone

Comments

@Bomret
Copy link

Bomret commented May 26, 2020

Brief description of your issue

If a user wants to install the latest Microsoft.Edge, one would assume that this is done by winget install Microsoft.Edge, which is the exact ID. But this fails as winget seems to do a search first and by that also finds Microsoft.EdgeDev and Microsoft.EdgeDev. You have to pass in winget install --exact --id Microsoft.Edge which is not very intuitive. Specifiying the exact ID should be sufficient.

Steps to reproduce

  • run winget install Microsoft.Edge

Expected behavior

Installation of Microsoft.Edge starts.

Actual behavior

  • installation does not start
  • winget lists Microsoft.Edge, Microsoft.EdgeDev and Microsoft.EdgeBeta as it seems to be confused which one to take.

Environment

Windows Package Manager v0.1.41331 Preview
Copyright (c) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.

Windows: Windows.Desktop v10.0.18363.836
Package: Microsoft.DesktopAppInstaller v1.0.41331.0
@ghost ghost added the Needs-Triage Issue need to be triaged label May 26, 2020
@megamorf
Copy link

@Bomret Thanks for reporting this problem. However, I'd recommend you close this issue as this problem has been reported multiple times already:

#133
#282
#301

@Bomret
Copy link
Author

Bomret commented May 26, 2020

@megamorf sorry, I didn't find those issues. Will do!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants