Should the handleIssueUrlRequest be more powerful?

[bpasero]

Testing #180757

I wonder if allowing an extension to return a URI is powerful enough? Why not let the extension decide how to file the issue?

For example, if an extension has a way to report issues via API and not via browser, it would be hard to adopt it here. I think an extension should deal with issue reporting in the best way it can and then open a browser tab if needed.

[TylerLeonhardt]

Yeah it's a good idea but a tough balance between allowing the extension to do whatever it wants and providing a nice way that extensions don't have to re-invent the wheel.

[justschen]

closing, and tracking new API updates here: #196863

(ie, handleIssueURI and the new API we added will be able to be used together, and conversations are ongoing regarding how the API should be used/modified)