-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 230
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Consider moving eliding of properties of type never
lower
#1128
Comments
I think yes to both. |
Beat me to it :) I think the answer to both is "yes" and "yes", though we can definitely discuss it in a design meeting. |
OK, I agree. This is ready to discuss and hopefully just a quick approval. :) |
#TeamYesYes |
Leaving this as design we should also consider if it makes sense to go even lower into the core. |
never
eliding into metadata handlingnever
lower
|
Moving forward, need a proposal on whether to provide this functionality in helpers, or in the compiler |
never
intoMetadataInfo.isPayloadProperty
?2. [Yes] Should we also elide metadata properties (header, query, etc.) of typenever
?https://github.com/microsoft/cadl/pull/1127/files#r988024779
EDIT: Or should we go even farther and move this into the core, for example by having the checker drop the properties altogether?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: