Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

No built application for download #486

Closed
creotiv opened this issue May 7, 2019 · 32 comments
Closed

No built application for download #486

creotiv opened this issue May 7, 2019 · 32 comments

Comments

@creotiv
Copy link

creotiv commented May 7, 2019

WTF guys, you can't make built version of app? so to use it i need to download huge amounts of not needed data and applications? That not how the Linux works.

@lol768
Copy link

lol768 commented May 7, 2019

Mentioned in #428 a bit already

@creotiv
Copy link
Author

creotiv commented May 7, 2019

Im not the one)

@DavidDeSloovere
Copy link

Have patience, if there is no release, then Terminal hasn't been released yet for preview.
Also, doesn't hurt to be polite.

@creotiv
Copy link
Author

creotiv commented May 7, 2019

@DavidDeSloovere if it not released yet, then where i got the link to this repo?
Im very polite as it possible with MS brand.

And also polite mean to make installation for users, and not throwing in their faces some code and say "do whatever you want with it". And really i don't see a problem to build executable installation, it's a task for few hours max for one dev.

@LauraWebdev
Copy link

LauraWebdev commented May 7, 2019

@creotiv you are looking at the source code of the new terminal. There is no official build available yet so you either build it yourself or wait until the first builds come in. It's really not that hard to understand...

@ZgblKylin
Copy link

The generated .appx file does not contain any certificates, it couldn't be installed by double-click or powershell. The only way I found is select "Deploy Solution" in vs2017 IDE.

@creotiv
Copy link
Author

creotiv commented May 7, 2019

@andreasWebDev so why there is no installer? is it so hard to make?

@cjim8889
Copy link

cjim8889 commented May 7, 2019

Why don't you develop your own terminal instead of asking like you are the CEO of Microsoft?

@creotiv
Copy link
Author

creotiv commented May 7, 2019

@cjim8889 why i should?

@wayheming
Copy link

@creotiv why should they?

@creotiv
Copy link
Author

creotiv commented May 7, 2019

@wayheming because they published it and advertise it

@wayheming
Copy link

wayheming commented May 7, 2019

@creotiv So what? they told you that there is no release yet

@creotiv
Copy link
Author

creotiv commented May 7, 2019

@wayheming then maybe should think about that before start advertise it? or spent 1-2h and make installation. It's installation and not human like AI system

@wayheming
Copy link

@creotiv you can always not use analog from the Internet if you don't have enough knowledge to install this terminal

@scottbilas
Copy link

The sense of entitlement is strong with this one

@creotiv
Copy link
Author

creotiv commented May 7, 2019

@wayheming strange to hear this in MS repo which is "new era UX"))

@wayheming
Copy link

@creotiv good luck with learning terminal installation

@GreenMan36
Copy link

@Creotive

Dear creorive,

I would like to leave you some words, I do mean to end the discussion and not advance it.

There will be a Windows store entry for early adopters sometime this summer. And the release date is set for this Winter.

They advertised this for developers to thinker and contribute, not for anyone to just press a build file or use an installer.

By enabling the current barrier you ensure that the people who are using it have the skills to do so the right way. And therefore are able to contribute correctly.

If there was a simple build file or installer, I, an everyday Joe, will thinker with it and I may screw things up on my computer or make excessive issues on this GitHub. (I would say, one like this.)

So i am convinced that this is the perfect way to tease this product. Mind you that this is a release but not a Launch of the product. This is like an alpha, not representative of the final product and thus not finished.

Would you complain the same way if Valve gave away the source for HL3 but wont give you an installer? No, you should be happy with what you got.

If you are un-able to build this yourself or find it too much of a hassle, this product is probably not made for you. (Sorry)

But I doubt that since I could get this to work and I dont know what i am doing.

I hope this gives you a different perspective on the discussion.

-Jasper

PS: if you really want to have an easy way to install this, fork it, fix it, make a pull request and contribute.

PPS: Some people shouldn't act like a ass just because they think different. @wayheming @scottbilas @cjim8889

@wayheming
Copy link

@10jasper10
I agree that @creotiv should not act like an ass

@GreenMan36
Copy link

@wayheming
I didn't mean that but whatever floats your boat man. 🙃

@wayheming
Copy link

@10jasper10 🐟🌊👴

@glen-84
Copy link

glen-84 commented May 7, 2019

Duplicate of #468.

@warpdesign
Copy link

Have patience, if there is no release, then Terminal hasn't been released yet for preview.
Also, doesn't hurt to be polite.

Then why inviting people to try it out?

image

@wayheming
Copy link

@warpdesign Twitter account is called Windows Developer and implies that the person will be able to cope with the installation from GitHub

@notmike101
Copy link

notmike101 commented May 7, 2019

Then why inviting people to try it out?

You're referencing that picture of a tweet, right? The tweet posted by Windows Developer? The Twitter account primarily followed by developers? The one that says "Microsoft Developer is your resource for development tips, tricks, research, case studies...Everything you need to develop apps that users love."? The tweet I'm assuming is targeted towards developers, not standard users?

You're talking about that one, right?

Even then, my only real question to you is this:
https://github.com/warpdesign/js-x86

Where's your binaries? Just because it's "early and incomplete" (just like this code on this repo is) shouldn't be an excuse.

@wayheming
Copy link

@notmike101 exactly!

@PLQin
Copy link

PLQin commented May 7, 2019

Expect an executable installer because I won't compile ,
emmm ;

remind me when you're ready 👍

@wayheming
Copy link

@PLQin
Initial builds of WSL 2 will be available through the Windows insider program by the end of June 2019.
https://devblogs.microsoft.com/commandline/announcing-wsl-2/

@creotiv
Copy link
Author

creotiv commented May 7, 2019

3 month to make an installer for an app)) that's nice)

@creotiv
Copy link
Author

creotiv commented May 7, 2019

Then why inviting people to try it out?

You're referencing that picture of a tweet, right? The tweet posted by Windows Developer? The Twitter account primarily followed by developers? The one that says "Microsoft Developer is your resource for development tips, tricks, research, case studies...Everything you need to develop apps that users love."? The tweet I'm assuming is targeted towards developers, not standard users?

You're talking about that one, right?

Even then, my only real question to you is this:
https://github.com/warpdesign/js-x86

Where's your binaries? Just because it's "early and incomplete" (just like this code on this repo is) shouldn't be an excuse.

Because its not a system app))) so it strange to have executable on it)

@wayheming
Copy link

@creotiv this is open source project you always can create pull request with installer but you can only demand and scoff

@DHowett-MSFT
Copy link
Contributor

Hi there. Thanks for being so excited to jump in.

I'm going to lock this issue, and I'll have to ask you to please remain civil.

@microsoft microsoft locked as too heated and limited conversation to collaborators May 7, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests