Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

rename operational configuration to application configuration #98

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 17, 2019

Conversation

technosophos
Copy link
Contributor

Per #95, this renames OperationalConfiguration (and all related terminology) to ApplicationConfiguration (with related terminology).

BREAKING CHANGE.

Closes #95

@technosophos technosophos requested a review from vturecek as a code owner August 27, 2019 18:26
@technosophos technosophos self-assigned this Aug 27, 2019
@tomkerkhove
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @technosophos

@technosophos technosophos force-pushed the 95-rename-app-config branch 4 times, most recently from c575ed6 to 5c796b0 Compare August 29, 2019 17:45
@technosophos
Copy link
Contributor Author

I made a handful of small additional changes to try to disambiguate a few uses of the term "application". But I think there are probably more that we will need to make in future PRs.

@hongchaodeng
Copy link
Member

@technosophos
Can you rebase and fix this PR? I feel like this is quite necessary and pending for a while. I can help take over and finish it if you are short of time :)

@technosophos
Copy link
Contributor Author

I am working on it today.

Per #95, this renames OperationalConfiguration (and all related terminology) to ApplicationConfiguration (with related terminology).

BREAKING CHANGE.

Closes #95
Copy link
Contributor

@suhuruli suhuruli left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

},
"labels": {
"type":"object",
"type": "object",
"description": "A set of string key/value pairs used as arbitrary labels on this operational configuration.",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should probably be application configuration?

},
"annotations": {
"type":"object",
"type": "object",
"description": "A set of string key/value pairs used as arbitrary annotations on this operational configuration.",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should probably be application configuration?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Why don't we naming operationalConfiguration to Application?
5 participants