Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

TimePickerCompat #26642

Closed
24 of 27 tasks
paulgildea opened this issue Feb 3, 2023 · 6 comments
Closed
24 of 27 tasks

TimePickerCompat #26642

paulgildea opened this issue Feb 3, 2023 · 6 comments

Comments

@paulgildea
Copy link
Member

paulgildea commented Feb 3, 2023

💡 When you create a PR for any of the checklist items, add a link to this Epic under the PR's Related Issues section.

Preparation

Implementation

Validation

@briandrouin
Copy link

Design contact: Toshie

ADO task

@gouttierre
Copy link
Contributor

gouttierre commented Oct 30, 2023

📢"Toshie checked in with Mark Wheeler. They had a default time picker. They will be picking up this work in the next couple of months. Teams will loop in Amber when ready with integrations.

ODSP would like the component to achieve parity v8-v9. OSDP will want to shim the component if they need it. Amber is checking in with Geoff Cox.

in preview timepicker"

@gouttierre
Copy link
Contributor

📢" Component is in preview timepicker"
"All is good so far with development. Toshie sent Amber a contact on the Team's team as they are looking to substitute their time picker."

@briandrouin
Copy link

Toshie to reach out to essential partners for additional feedback.

@gouttierre
Copy link
Contributor

📢"Amber had sent a few demos to Toshie and developers for review and feedback. Toshie will connect with partners to get additional feedback. Amber is scheduling a bug bash this or next week."

@YuanboXue-Amber
Copy link
Contributor

YuanboXue-Amber commented Jan 9, 2024

Released as stable v0.1.0

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants