-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 823
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Please explain difference between store, distribution, and wsl --update wsl versions #10551
Comments
It is not :) |
@rfay: The recommended method is always to use wsl.exe --install. If the Windows version supports store WSL, then wsl --install will install Store WSL. If not, it will install inbox WSL. |
Thank you @OneBlue - Why were three different WSL.exe installations mentioned in the recent issues? |
|
Thank you! I hope there will be more consistency in the future. I should be able to completely remove references to the MS Store version in DDEV Docs right? Just tell them to
That's completely obsolete right? |
Not really, installing via the store is still supported. Under the hood this will install the latest WSL release and we'll continue to support that. |
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
I have been baffled for some time by the various recipes for installing or maintaining WSL2. Some people/recipes say that you have to install from the store. Others say you have to download it. Often
wsl --update
andwsl --install
are fine. A recent issue said that wsl.exe might be in 3 different places on the Windows side.Is any of this true? Surely there can be one wsl.exe distributed in different ways.
In writing the DDEV docs for WSL2 install I tell people to install with
wsl --install
and then go install it from the store. Is that really reasonable?Describe the solution you'd like
Describe alternatives you've considered
Live on in confusion.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: