-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
FancyZones Add multi-layered/overlapping zone support #6744
Comments
I see Shift+Win+Arrows allows spanning multiple zones. I still wouldn't mind having the option of setting up advanced multi-layered layouts, though. It would allow a combined priority grid + standard columnar layout at the same time. No need to go into FancyZones to change layout, if I want to switch from one to another. A layout switcher shortcut would also be a decent, easier solution to this. I.e. next and previous layout, among a list of enabled layouts for a monitor. |
Is this what you're asking for? |
Ah, yes. That's perfect. Wish there was a way to do this by keyboard, but that should probably be a separate issue. |
Can we reopen the request for this feature? I want a 2nd layer of custom zones I can quickly access that doesn't match up to the main layer like it appears Sardtok's does. |
@OstrichRider please create a dedicated ask that clearly helps articulate the ask and scenario. |
This was super helpful but the link in this comment is dead, this is the updated link: Hope this helps. |
@appel, we shifted from the wiki to official docs, yes, that is the correct link |
📝 Multiple overlapping zones
With FancyZones you cannot have a combined grid and column layout, where you can swap between snapping to e.g. corners or the entire column, like the default Windows layout manager.
An option to setup additional layers of overlapping zones, or joining two or more zones as a grouped zone, would increase the flexibility of layouts.
What is the expected behavior of the proposed feature? What is the scenario this would be used?
If you'd like to see this feature implemented, add a 👍 reaction to this post.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: